Analisis Yuridis terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023 Dikaitkan dengan Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Positif Legislator

Authors

  • Ahdi Hidayat Universitas Suryakancana
  • M. Haykel Universitas Suryakancana
  • Rizqi Ulmaliyah Alhaddi Universitas Suryakancana
  • Selsa Selviana Universitas Suryakancana
  • Siva Delvina Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/humif.v1i3.292

Keywords:

Constitutional Court, Positive Legislature, Negative Legislature

Abstract

National implementation must reflect the Constitution's wishes for all citizens. Articles 56 and 57 of Law Number 24 of 2003 concerning the Constitutional Court explained that the Constitutional Court has the authority to review the 1945 NRI Law. The Constitutional Court does not always play a negative role as a legislator in making decisions. In rare cases, developments have led to a transition to the type of Constitutional Court decisions that extend to positive legislation. This research uses a normative legal approach. Research by conducting legal research. The results of this research indicate that the change in Constitutional Court law from negative to positive was based on the need to fill legal gaps and balance legal certainty, justice, and expediency. Constitutional Court Decision 90/PUU-XXI/2023 introduces new regulations that limit the minimum age requirements for presidential/vice presidential candidates, taking into account their experience in office.

References

A. Mukthie Fadjar. (2006). Hukum Konstitusi dan Mahkamah Konstitusi. : Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan MK RI.

Adena Fitri Puspita Sari dan Purwono Sungkono Raharjo. (2022). Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Negative Legislator Dan Positive Legislator. Jurnal Demokrasi Dan Ketahanan Nasional, 1(1), hlm. 685.

Esfandiari dan Fitria. (2012). Positive Legislature Mahkamah Konstitusi di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum 1, hlm. 3.

Hani Adhani. (n.d.). Mahkamah Konstitusi Indonesia di Era Digital: Upaya Menegakan Konstitusi,Keadilan Substantif dan Budaya Sadar Berkonstitusi. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan, 2(2), 131.

Huda, N. (4532). Dinamika Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. FH UII Press.

Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi. (2010). Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi.

Martitah. (2013a). Mahkamah Konstitusi Dari Negative Legislature ke Positive Legislature. Konstitusi Press.

Martitah. (2013b). Mahkamah Konstitusi Dari Negative Legislature ke Positive Legislature. Konstitusi Press.

Moh. Mahfud MD. (2009). Rambu Pembatas Dan Perluasan Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Hukum, 16(4), 453.

Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi. (2010). Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi.

Sugiono Margi dan Maulida Khazanah. (2019). Kedudukan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Kelembagaan Negara. JURNAL RECHTEN: RISET HUKUM DAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA, 1(3), hlm. 32.

Published

2024-05-26

How to Cite

Ahdi Hidayat, M. Haykel, Rizqi Ulmaliyah Alhaddi, Selsa Selviana, & Siva Delvina. (2024). Analisis Yuridis terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023 Dikaitkan dengan Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Positif Legislator. Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial Dan Humaniora, 1(3), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.62383/humif.v1i3.292

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.