Pengangkatan Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi (Studi Perbandingan Negara Indonesia dengan Negara Thailand)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/humif.v2i1.995Keywords:
Constitutional Court Judges, Appointments, ComparisonsAbstract
The appointment of Constitutional Court Judges between one country and another certainly has similarities and differences. This is greatly influenced by the history, state system and political situation of a country. Therefore, a problem is formulated regarding the characteristics of the mechanism for appointing constitutional court judges between Indonesia and Thailand. This study aims to determine and analyze the differences in filling constitutional court judge positions between Indonesia and Thailand. The study uses a normative legal method using primary, secondary, and tertiary data because by using this method, this study can produce descriptive data obtained from written words related to the object of the writing. This study also uses a comparative method between Indonesia and Thailand. The results of this study indicate that there are significant differences regarding the mechanism for appointing constitutional judges. Indonesia was proposed by three state institutions with their respective procedures, then Thailand was proposed by the Judicial institution and a special committee was formed to select constitutional judges.
References
Ashari, Ashari, dan Riska Ari Amalia. “Konstitusionalitas Pemberhentian Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Oleh Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat.” Jurnal Ilmiah Global Education 4, no. 1 (2023): 50–56.
Faiz, Pan Mohamad, dan M. Lutfi Chakim. Peradilan konstitusi: perbandingan kelembagaan dan kewenangan konstitusional di Asia. Rajawali Pers, 2020.
Harijanti, Susi Dwi. “Pengisian Jabatan Hakim: Kebutuhan Reformasi dan Pengekangan Diri.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 21, no. 4 (2014): 531–58.
Maruarar Siahaan. Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Sinar Grafika, 2011.
Moh.mahfud. Konstitusi Dan Hukum dalam Kontroversi Isu. Rajawali Pers, t.t.
Palguna, I., dan Dewa Gede. “Constitutional Complaint and the Protection of Citizens the Constitutional Rights.” Const. Rev. 3 (2017): 1.
Pasal 17 Undang-undang Mahkamah Konstitusi Thailand (t.t.).
Pasal 20 undang-undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2020 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi perubahan ketiga undang-undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi (t.t.).
Pasal 200 Konstitusi Thailand; pasal 8 undang-undang mahkamah konstitusi Thailand (t.t.).
Puspitomanik, Cindy Dalli. “Kepastian Pengaturan Pengisian Jabatan Hakim Konstitusi Sebagai Upaya Pengawasan Preventif.” Justitia Jurnal Hukum 4, no. 1 (2020). https://journal.um-surabaya.ac.id/Justitia/article/view/4019.
Surkati, H. Acmad. “Kedudukan Dan Wewenang Mahkamah Konstitusi Ditinjau dari Konsep Demokrasi Konstitusional Studi Perbandingan di Tiga Negara (Indonesia, Jerman, dan Thailand),” 2006.
Syahputra, Dedy, dan Zulman Subaidi. “Kedudukan Dan Mekanisme Pengisian Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia.” REUSAM: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 9, no. 1 (2021). https://ojs.unimal.ac.id/reusam/article/view/4979.
Theresia Felisiani. “Pansel Calon Hakim MK Buka Masukan dari Masyarakat.” Diakses 27 November 2023. https://www.tribunnews.com/nasional/2019/12/06/pansel-calon-hakim-mk-buka-masukan-dari-masyarakat.
Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi (t.t.).
Wijayanti, Winda, dan Nuzul Quraini. “Transparansi dan Partisipasi Publik dalam Rekrutmen Calon Hakim Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 12, no. 4 (2015): 663–90.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
