Electoral Justice in Indonesia's Presidential System: A Normative Study of the Presidential Threshold and Constitutional Court Decision No. 14/PUU-XI/2013

Authors

  • Santoso Budi Nursal Umar Universitas Slamet Riyadi
  • FX. Hastowo Broto Laksito Universitas Slamet Riyadi
  • Lintang Cahya Primadani Universitas Slamet Riyadi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/humif.v3i1.2827

Keywords:

Constitutional Court, Constitutional Democracy, Electoral Justice, People's Sovereignty, Presidential Threshold

Abstract

This research aims to normatively analyze the legal basis, rationality, and implications of the presidential threshold on the multi-party system and the principle of electoral justice in Indonesia, with a focus on Constitutional Court Decision Number 14/PUU-XI/2013. Thru a normative legal approach, this research examines the provisions of Article 222 of Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections and the Constitutional Court's constitutional arguments in maintaining the presidential nomination threshold. The analysis results show that although formally the presidential threshold is an open and legitimate legal policy, it substantially creates political inequality and limits the participation of small parties in the multi-party system. The Constitutional Court's decision is considered not fully reflective of the principles of electoral justice and popular sovereignty, as it prioritizes government stability over political equality. Therefore, it is necessary to reformulate the presidential candidacy threshold policy to make it more proportional, inclusive, and aligned with the principles of constitutional democracy. This reform is expected to strengthen the legitimacy of Indonesia's presidential system without neglecting the fundamental values of justice and political representation of the people.

 

References

Andiani, T. N., Laksito, F. H. B., & Santos, J. G. (2023). Evidence from Indonesia on the legal policy confronting discrimination of minority groups based on race and ethnicity. Wacana Hukum, 29(2), 146–162. https://doi.org/10.33061/wh.v29i2.9808

Butt, S., & Lindsey, T. (2018). Judicial review and the rule of law in Indonesia: The rise and role of the Constitutional Court. Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal, 27(2), 267–295.

Diamond, L. (2019). Ill winds: Saving democracy from Russian rage, Chinese ambition, and American complacency. Penguin Press.

Ginsburg, T. (2003). Judicial review in new democracies: Constitutional courts in Asian cases. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511511189

Isra, S. (2016). Konfigurasi politik dan kekuasaan kehakiman di Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 13(1), 1–22.

Lev, D. S. (2018). Legal evolution and political authority in Indonesia: Selected essays. Brill.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2013). Putusan Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013 tentang pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 2008 terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia.

Nurcahyo, N., Ricky, R., Laksito, F. H. B., & Manitra, R. R. M. (2024). Reform of the criminal law system in Indonesia which prioritizes substantive justice. Journal of Law, Environmental and Justice, 2(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.62264/jlej.v2i1.91

Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv31xf5v0

Sadurski, W. (2019). Constitutional democracy in crisis? Oxford University Press.

Samuels, D., & Shugart, M. S. (2010). Presidents, parties, and prime ministers: How the separation of powers affects party organization and behavior. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511780882

Sartori, G. (1997). Comparative constitutional engineering: An inquiry into structures, incentives, and outcomes. New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25217-6

Thornhill, C. (2021). Constitutionalism and political modernity: A sociological analysis. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 19(3), 712–736.

Tushnet, M. (2018). Constitutional courts as deliberative institutions: A comparative perspective. International Constitutional Law Journal, 16(4), 849–873.

Widodo, D. (2020). Presidential threshold dalam perspektif sistem presidensial: Analisis terhadap Putusan MK No. 14/PUU-XI/2013. Jurnal Konstitusi, 17(2), 290–312.

Yuliandri. (2021). Presidential threshold dan problematika demokrasi konstitusional di Indonesia. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 18(4), 451–470.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-24

How to Cite

Santoso Budi Nursal Umar, FX. Hastowo Broto Laksito, & Lintang Cahya Primadani. (2026). Electoral Justice in Indonesia’s Presidential System: A Normative Study of the Presidential Threshold and Constitutional Court Decision No. 14/PUU-XI/2013. Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial Dan Humaniora, 3(1), 146–157. https://doi.org/10.62383/humif.v3i1.2827

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.