Wanprestasi dan PKPU: Kewajiban Sentul City dalam Sengketa Kepailitan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/humif.v2i3.1803Keywords:
PKPU, Sentul City, Peace Plan, Debt, Judicial ReviewAbstract
The case of Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) of PT Sentul City Tbk is one example of the complexity of dispute resolution between corporations and creditors. The PKPU application was filed by PT Prakasaguna Ciptapratama on January 7, 2021 at the Central Jakarta Commercial Court on the grounds that there was a debt due that had not been paid. Although the peace plan had been approved by the majority of creditors and ratified by the court on March 15, 2021, some consumers who felt aggrieved filed for a Judicial .Review (PK). They based their lawsuit on the postponement of the signing of the Deed of Sale and Purchase (AJB) which had lasted for more than 15 years. This study aims to analyze the legal aspects, financial implications, and social impacts of this case, including an evaluation of the PKPU mechanism in resolving debt disputes in Indonesia.
References
Amal, F. R., Nurudin, A., & Lestari, A. T. W. (2024). Perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen perumahan akibat developer dinyatakan pailit. Notary Law Research, 6(1), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.56444/nlr.v6i1.2200
Bisnis.com. (2021, Maret 15). Rencana perdamaian Sentul City disahkan mayoritas kreditur. https://finansial.bisnis.com/read/20210315/9/1368004/
Budiarti, K. U. S. (2021). Perlindungan hukum bagi pembeli dalam akta jual beli yang batal demi hukum berdasarkan putusan hakim. Indonesian Notary, 3(1), Article 28. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/notary/vol3/iss1/28
CNBC Indonesia. (2021, Maret 17). PKPU PT Sentul City disahkan, ini rencana pembayaran utangnya. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/market/20210317104535-17-230927
Dewi, S. (2017). Peran pengurus dalam proses PKPU di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum IUS, 5(1),
Harahap, M. Y. (2016). Hukum kepailitan dan penundaan kewajiban pembayaran utang. Sinar Grafika.
Hastuti, D. D. (2022). Analisis kasus PKPU PT Sentul City Tbk. Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi, 10(1). [Halaman tidak dicantumkan].
Hukumonline.com. (2021, Februari 10). Sentul City dalam status PKPU, konsumen berharap tak dirugikan. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/sentul-city-dalam-status-pkpu--konsumen-berharap-tak-dirugikan-lt6024d993c7d64
Kompas.com. (2021, April 14). Konsumen ajukan PK karena tak terima putusan PKPU PT Sentul City. https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2021/04/14/12010091
Lestari, L. (2021). Keadilan bagi kreditor minoritas dalam PKPU. Jurnal Yustisia, 6(1),
Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Pusat. (2021). Putusan No. 23/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2021/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst tentang permohonan PKPU PT Sentul City Tbk oleh PT Prakasaguna Ciptapratama.
Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Pusat. (2021). Putusan No. 349/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2021/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst.
Sari, R. A. (2023). Perlindungan hukum bagi kreditur minoritas dalam proses PKPU menurut Undang-Undang Kepailitan. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 20(3), 213–228.
Turisno, I. P. B. E., & Suharto, R. (2016). Perlindungan konsumen terhadap pembayaran uang muka pembelian rumah apabila tidak dapat melakukan penandatanganan akta jual beli sesuai waktu yang telah ditentukan. Diponegoro Law Journal, 5(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2016.13460
Utami, F. N., & Nugroho, B. (2022). Analisis yuridis kedudukan konsumen sebagai kreditur separatis dalam perkara PKPU. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, 10(2), 144–152.
Wijaya, A. P., & Ramadhani, Y. F. (2023). Implementasi prinsip keadilan dalam perdamaian PKPU: Studi kasus pada PT Sentul City Tbk. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, 12(1), 55–65.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
