Konsep Putusan Hakim pada Pengadilan Agama di Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/humif.v2i4.2376Keywords:
Executive Authority, Islamic Economics, Judge Professionalism, Judicial Rulings, Religious CourtsAbstract
A ruling is a decision delivered by a judge in a trial, aimed at resolving a dispute or legal matter between the parties involved. There are various types of rulings, such as Declarative Rulings, Constitutive Rulings, Condemnatory Rulings, Contradictory Rulings, and Default Rulings. Each ruling has two kinds of authority: binding authority and executive authority, which refers to the power to enforce the ruling. Judges play a central role and have a significant responsibility in upholding the law and justice. Therefore, judges' professionalism must continually be improved to ensure that rulings are fair and in accordance with applicable regulations. Not only judges, but all members and staff of the Religious Courts are also required to enhance their professionalism in performing their duties. This is particularly important considering the expanded jurisdiction of Religious Courts in handling cases in the field of Islamic economics, which is still relatively new. As a result, the application of the concept of judicial rulings in Indonesia’s Religious Courts must continue to evolve to meet the public's expectations for justice based on the law.
References
Anshori, A. G. (2018). Rekonstruksi kewenangan hakim Pengadilan Agama dalam penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah. Jurnal Hukum Islam, 16(2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.28918/jhi.v16i2.1832
Arto, M. (1996). Praktek perkara perdata pada Pengadilan Agama. Pustaka Pelajar.
Aulia, R. (2020). Pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan perkara cerai gugat di Pengadilan Agama. Al-Hukama: The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law, 10(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.15642/alhukama.2020.10.1.45-57
Bisri, C. H. (1997). Peradilan Islam dalam tatanan masyarakat Indonesia (Cet. 1). Remaja Rosdakarya.
Bisri, C. H. (2010). Penyelesaian sengketa perbankan syariah di Pengadilan Agama dan Mahkamah Syariah. Kencana Persada Media Grup.
Fauzan, M. (2016). Kedudukan yurisprudensi dalam sistem hukum peradilan agama di Indonesia. Jurnal Yudisial, 9(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v9i1.101
Hidayat, R. (2021). Implementasi asas keadilan dalam putusan hakim Pengadilan Agama. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(2), 150–162. https://doi.org/10.24853/jih.8.2.150-162
Kurniawan, I. (2019). Eksekusi putusan Pengadilan Agama dalam perkara ekonomi syariah: Problematika dan solusi. Jurnal Rechts Vinding, 8(2), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v8i2.327
Mappong, Z. (2010). Eksekusi putusan serta merta: Proses gugatan dan cara membuat putusan serta pelaksanaan eksekusi dalam perkara perdata. Tunggal Mandiri Publishing.
Metokusumo, S. (1993). Hukum acara perdata Indonesia. Liberty.
Mujahidin, A. (2010). Prosedur penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah di Indonesia. Ghalia Indonesia.
Mujahidin, A. (2012). Pembaharuan hukum acara Peradilan Agama. Ghalia Indonesia.
Ramadhan, A. (2023). Independensi hakim dalam memutus perkara perdata syariah di Pengadilan Agama. Mazahib: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam, 22(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v22i1.4315
Rasyid, R. A. (1998). Hukum acara Peradilan Agama. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sarwono. (2011). Hukum acara perdata: Teori dan praktik. Sinar Grafika.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



