Konsep Putusan Hakim pada Pengadilan Agama di Indonesia

Authors

  • Kahar Muzakir Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Aceh Tamiang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/humif.v2i4.2376

Keywords:

Executive Authority, Islamic Economics, Judge Professionalism, Judicial Rulings, Religious Courts

Abstract

A ruling is a decision delivered by a judge in a trial, aimed at resolving a dispute or legal matter between the parties involved. There are various types of rulings, such as Declarative Rulings, Constitutive Rulings, Condemnatory Rulings, Contradictory Rulings, and Default Rulings. Each ruling has two kinds of authority: binding authority and executive authority, which refers to the power to enforce the ruling. Judges play a central role and have a significant responsibility in upholding the law and justice. Therefore, judges' professionalism must continually be improved to ensure that rulings are fair and in accordance with applicable regulations. Not only judges, but all members and staff of the Religious Courts are also required to enhance their professionalism in performing their duties. This is particularly important considering the expanded jurisdiction of Religious Courts in handling cases in the field of Islamic economics, which is still relatively new. As a result, the application of the concept of judicial rulings in Indonesia’s Religious Courts must continue to evolve to meet the public's expectations for justice based on the law.

References

Anshori, A. G. (2018). Rekonstruksi kewenangan hakim Pengadilan Agama dalam penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah. Jurnal Hukum Islam, 16(2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.28918/jhi.v16i2.1832

Arto, M. (1996). Praktek perkara perdata pada Pengadilan Agama. Pustaka Pelajar.

Aulia, R. (2020). Pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan perkara cerai gugat di Pengadilan Agama. Al-Hukama: The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law, 10(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.15642/alhukama.2020.10.1.45-57

Bisri, C. H. (1997). Peradilan Islam dalam tatanan masyarakat Indonesia (Cet. 1). Remaja Rosdakarya.

Bisri, C. H. (2010). Penyelesaian sengketa perbankan syariah di Pengadilan Agama dan Mahkamah Syariah. Kencana Persada Media Grup.

Fauzan, M. (2016). Kedudukan yurisprudensi dalam sistem hukum peradilan agama di Indonesia. Jurnal Yudisial, 9(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v9i1.101

Hidayat, R. (2021). Implementasi asas keadilan dalam putusan hakim Pengadilan Agama. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(2), 150–162. https://doi.org/10.24853/jih.8.2.150-162

Kurniawan, I. (2019). Eksekusi putusan Pengadilan Agama dalam perkara ekonomi syariah: Problematika dan solusi. Jurnal Rechts Vinding, 8(2), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v8i2.327

Mappong, Z. (2010). Eksekusi putusan serta merta: Proses gugatan dan cara membuat putusan serta pelaksanaan eksekusi dalam perkara perdata. Tunggal Mandiri Publishing.

Metokusumo, S. (1993). Hukum acara perdata Indonesia. Liberty.

Mujahidin, A. (2010). Prosedur penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah di Indonesia. Ghalia Indonesia.

Mujahidin, A. (2012). Pembaharuan hukum acara Peradilan Agama. Ghalia Indonesia.

Ramadhan, A. (2023). Independensi hakim dalam memutus perkara perdata syariah di Pengadilan Agama. Mazahib: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam, 22(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v22i1.4315

Rasyid, R. A. (1998). Hukum acara Peradilan Agama. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sarwono. (2011). Hukum acara perdata: Teori dan praktik. Sinar Grafika.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-14

How to Cite

Kahar Muzakir. (2025). Konsep Putusan Hakim pada Pengadilan Agama di Indonesia. Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial Dan Humaniora, 2(4), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.62383/humif.v2i4.2376

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.