Kewenangan Penyidikan oleh ANKUM pada Kasus Pidana Militer dalam Menghadapi Tantangan Konflik Kepentingan Internal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/humif.v1i4.818Keywords:
Ankum, Law Enforcement, Investigation, Military Law, conflict of interest, DPPDMAbstract
Criminal law enforcement in Indonesia involves different procedures between civil society and the military, especially at the investigation stage. In the military context, Law Number 31 of 1997 concerning Military Justice stipulates investigative authority involving superiors who have the right to punish (ANKUM), military police, and prosecutors. However, there is debate regarding ANKUM's authority in investigations, especially regarding professionalism and fairness, because ANKUM does not always have adequate investigative expertise. This research aims to analyze ANKUM's authority in the process of investigating military criminal cases, as well as the challenges of internal conflicts of interest that may arise. The research method used is normative juridical with an analytical and statutory approach. The research results show that ANKUM has an important role in the investigation process, including conducting preliminary examinations, receiving reports, and carrying out detentions. However, ANKUM often faces internal conflicts of interest and limitations in exercising its authority, which can affect the fairness and professionalism of the legal process. The Military Discipline Advisory and Supervision Council (DPPDM) functions to supervise and provide consideration of ANKUM's authority. This research suggests the need for stricter supervision and improvement of the functions of the DPPDM to ensure fair and professional law enforcement.
References
Bahasa Hukum: “Atasan yang Berhak Menghukum.” (2012). Retrieved from Hukum Online.com website: https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/bahasa-hukum--atasan-yang-berhak-menghukum-lt500ce2fa29cb9/?page=all
Cornella Olivia Rumbay, A. T. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Proses Penyelidikan Dan Acara Pidana Militer Di Indonesia. Scientia De Lex, 8(1), 3.
Ekayanti, R. (2015). Magister Hukum Udayana •. E-Issn 2502-3101 P-Issn 2302-528X, 4(138–149), 11.
Kaban, D. H. E., & Triadi, I. (2024). Kedudukan Hakim Pada Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Guna Merealisasikan Negara Hukum Indonesia. SYARIAH : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(3), 93–98. Retrieved from http://jurnalistiqomah.org/index.php/syariah/article/view/1372
Maksum, R. (2023). Apa Itu Hukum Pidana Militer? Retrieved from Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara website: https://fahum.umsu.ac.id/hukum-pidana-militer/
Penyelesaian, D., & Pidana, P. (2018). Penelitian oleh Dosen dan Pamasis STHM TA 2018. 1–44.
Peraturan Panglima Tentara Nasional Indonesia Nomor 46 Tahun 2015 Tentang Dewan Pertimbangan dan Pengawasan Disiplin Militer. , Pub. L. No. Nomor 46 tahun 2015 (2015). Indonesia.
Salidin, S. (2021). Rekonstruksi Regulasi Lembaga Dan Kewenangan Penyidik Dalam Sistem Peradilan Militer Berbasis Nilai Keadilan. Retrieved from http://repository.unissula.ac.id/25013/1/10301900056_fullpdf.pdf
Sugistiyoko, B. S. E. (2017). Hukum Disiplin Prajurit Tentara Nasional Indonesia/Militer Pada Komando Distrik Militer 0807/ Tulungagung. Jurnal Yustitiabelen, 3(1), 39–60.
Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hukum Disiplin Militer. , Pub. L. No. 25 (2014). Indonesia.
UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 31 TAHUN 1997 TENTANG PERADILAN MILITER. , Pub. L. No. 31 (1997).
UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 8 TAHUN 1981 TENTANG KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM ACARA PIDANA. , Pub. L. No. 8 (1981).
Utomo, E. (2018). Kewenangan Atasan Yang Berhak Menghukum (Ankum) Sebagai Penyidik Dalam Sistem Peradilan Militer. Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum, 10(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v10i1.1151
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
