Evaluasi Implementasi Tahap Awal Program Pendidikan Sekolah Rakyat di SRMA 19 Bantul

Authors

  • Wahyu Insani Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
  • Suwadi Suwadi Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/hardik.v3i1.2801

Keywords:

Alternative Education, CIPP Model, Early Implementation Phase, People's Schools, Program Evaluation

Abstract

In this study, the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) evaluation model was used to assess the implementation of the People's School Education Program in its early stages. People's schools are an alternative education method designed to improve access to education for vulnerable socioeconomic groups. This study employed a descriptive qualitative methodology and employed a case study design. Data were collected through analysis of institutional documentation and in-depth semi-structured interviews with educators and administrators directly involved in program implementation. The four main components of the CIPP model were used to analyze the obtained data thematically. The results indicate that the program has been contextually designed to meet the needs of the target community. In terms of input, the program is supported by institutional commitment to implementation, although there are still limitations related to learning facilities and the availability of human resources. In terms of process, program activities are implemented adaptively, and in terms of product, initial progress is seen in increasing learning motivation and strengthening student character. Overall, the findings of this study demonstrate progress in the early stages of implementation and suggest that ongoing evaluation is needed to support program refinement and sustainability.

References

Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: Lessons from international experiences. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587

Alanshori, M. Z., Maulidi, A., Zahidi, S., Kusaeri, K., & Suparto, S. (2025). The application of the CIPP evaluation model in educational programs in Indonesia. Scaffolding: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam dan Multikulturalisme, 7(2), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.37680/scaffolding.v7i2.7390

Budiyanto, N., Hardhienata, S., & Setyaningsih, S. (2023). Improving the effectiveness of daycare education strategy through program evaluation using the context, input, process, product (CIPP) model. International Journal of Education, Information Technology and Others (IJEIT), 6(3), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8264695

Citariani, N. M., & Riawan, O. (2025). Efektivitas model evaluasi CIPP dalam program pendidikan: Kajian literatur sistematis. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 16(2).

Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2021). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines (5th ed.). Pearson.

Hasanah, R. (2025). Ketimpangan akses pendidikan di daerah terpencil: Isu HAM dan kebijakan hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan HAM, 4(1), 1–9.

Oktariani, Nahadi, Sriyati, S., Munawarah, H. S. H., & Baruri, A. (2025). Evaluasi program pelatihan dengan model CIPP sebagai upaya membangun kompetensi digital guru IPA. SAP (Susunan Artikel Pendidikan), 9(3).

Sari, Y., Padmadewi, N. N., Suarcaya, P., Utami, I. L. P., & Ramendra, D. P. (2024). The evaluation of integrating English language learning program in Islamic boarding school: The CIPP model. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 28(2), 210–220. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v28i2.75962

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models, and applications. Jossey-Bass.

Suri, S., & Hariyati, N. (2024). Literature study: CIPP evaluation model in educational evaluation. JCP (Jurnal Cahaya Pendidikan), 10(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.33373/chypen.v10i1.5950

UNESCO. (2022). Mengimajinasikan kembali sebuah kontrak sosial baru untuk pendidikan masa depan kita (A. Lie & M. de Sousa, Eds.; Y. Nugroho, Trans.). UNESCO Publishing.

Valencia, M. M. A. (2022). Principles, scope, and limitations of the methodological triangulation. Investigación y Educación en Enfermería, 40(2). https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v40n2e03

Vega, A., Vanezha, I., Agustia, J., Rizqi, M., & Uzdah, R. (2024). Kesetaraan akses pendidikan: Analisis pengimplementasian nilai Pancasila dalam pemerataan akses pendidikan di Indonesia. Jurnal Lentera Ilmu, 1(2), 44–57.

Veziari, Y., Kumar, S., & Leach, M. J. (2022). An exploration of barriers and enablers to the conduct and application of research among complementary and alternative medicine stakeholders in Australia and New Zealand: A qualitative descriptive study. PLoS ONE, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264221

Yunzal Jr., A., Hungo, M., & Casinillo, L. F. (2024). Evaluation of school learning continuity plan (LCP) utilizing context, input, process, and product (CIPP) model. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 13(2), 226–237. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v13i2.74893

Downloads

Published

2026-01-21

How to Cite

Wahyu Insani, & Suwadi Suwadi. (2026). Evaluasi Implementasi Tahap Awal Program Pendidikan Sekolah Rakyat di SRMA 19 Bantul. Harmoni Pendidikan : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.62383/hardik.v3i1.2801

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.