Faktor Penghambat Peran Penyidik Polres Lampung Utara Terhadap Tindak Pidana Kekerasan yang Dilakukan Suami Terhadap Istri
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/humif.v2i4.2218Keywords:
patriarchal culture, law, domestic violence, penal mediation, investigatorsAbstract
This study aims to analyze and find the inhibiting factors faced by North Lampung Police investigators in handling domestic violence (KDRT) cases. The research approaches used are normative juridical and empirical juridical The normative juridical approach is carried out by examining laws and regulations related to the handling of domestic violence, such as Law Number 23 of 2004 concerning the Elimination of Domestic Violence. Meanwhile, an empirical juridical approach is carried out through the collection of primary data from interviews with investigators, prosecutors, academics, and non-governmental organizations active in handling domestic violence. Secondary data is obtained from legal literature, official documents, and applicable regulations. The results of the study show that there are several significant obstacles in the process of investigating domestic violence cases. These obstacles include the lack of sensitivity of investigators to the psychological condition of the victim, social pressure and stigma towards the victim that makes reporting low, and limited public understanding of forms of domestic violence, especially non-physical ones such as psychological and economic violence. Internal obstacles also arise from the limitations of supporting facilities such as victim-friendly examination rooms, psychological assistants, and special training for investigators in handling gender-based cases. From the juridical side, the lack of a clear rule regarding the limits of penal mediation in domestic violence cases creates legal uncertainty and opens up space for perpetrators to escape criminal snares through peace that is often impure. In addition, the patriarchal culture that is still strong in society is a structural obstacle in the law enforcement process that favors victims, especially women. Therefore, it is necessary to increase the capacity of investigators through continuous training, the provision of victim-friendly support facilities, widespread legal socialization to the community, and the reformulation of legal policies that are more firm and in favor of victims. Thus, law enforcement of domestic violence cases can be carried out more effectively, fairly, and oriented towards the protection of human rights.
References
Ali, Z. (2021). Metode penelitian hukum. Sinar Grafika.
Ashshofa, B. (2017). Metode penelitian hukum. PT Rineka Cipta.
Childress, S., Shrestha, N., Kenensarieva, K., Urbaeva, J., & Schrag, R. V. (2023). Factors inhibiting institutional responses to domestic violence in Kyrgyzstan. Violence Against Women, 30(5), 1198-1225. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012231186814
Coker, D. (2001). Crime control and feminist law reform in domestic violence law: A critical review. New Criminal Law Review, 4(2), 801-860. https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2001.4.2.801
Efendi, J., & Ibrahim, J. (2018). Metode penelitian hukum: Normatif dan empiris. Prenamedia Group.
Elindawati, R. (2021). Perspektif feminis dalam kasus perempuan sebagai korban kekerasan seksual di perguruan tinggi. Al-Wardah: Jurnal Kajian Perempuan, Gender dan Agama, 15(2), 181-193.
Harefa, A. (2021). Faktor-faktor penyebab terjadinya tindak pidana kekerasan dalam rumah tangga. Jurnal Panah Keadilan, 1(1), 18-21. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2023.20385
Imani, S. N. A., Imran, S. Y., & Apripari, A. (2024). Faktor penghambat penegakan hukum terhadap kekerasan perempuan dalam pacaran. Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia, 1(3), 222-235. https://doi.org/10.62383/amandemen.v1i3.298
Khan, A. S., Bashir, S., & Shehzad, F. (2023). Domestic violence: The psychological and legal factors that affect reporting, prosecution, and sentencing. SJESR, 6(1), 139-146. https://doi.org/10.36902/sjesr-vol6-iss1-2023(139-146)
Laksono, W., Hasibuan, S. A., & Siregar, F. R. (2022). Penerapan tingkat penyidikan tindak pidana kekerasan dalam rumah tangga. Jurnal Rectum, 4(2), 547-556.
Leasa, C. C., Adam, S., & Hattu, J. (2024). Penyelidikan dan penyidikan dalam perkara pidana. Tatohi: Jurnal Hukum, 4(6), 479-488.
Lianawati, E. (2009). Tiada keadilan tanpa kepedulian: KDRT perspektif psikologi feminis. Paradigma Indonesia.
M Noor Farchan, & Dian Alan. (2023). Analisis yuridis tindak pidana kekerasan dalam rumah tangga yang mengakibatkan kematian. Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, 111-116. https://doi.org/10.29313/jrih.v3i2.2998
Mestika, H. F. (2022). Perlindungan hukum pada perempuan korban kekerasan dalam rumah tangga di Indonesia. Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal, 2(1), 118-130.
Mumu, Z. P., Lolong, W. R. J., & Simandjuntak, R. (2025). Penegakan hukum tindak pidana kekerasan dalam rumah tangga. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik, 5(3), 2582-2593. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i3.4457
Novisky, M. A., & Peralta, R. L. (2014). When women tell: Intimate partner violence and the factors related to police notification. Violence Against Women, 21(1), 65-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801214564078
Nugroho, D. C. (2021). Pelaksanaan penyidikan tindak pidana kekerasan dalam rumah tangga oleh Unit Pelayanan Perempuan dan Anak di Kepolisian Resor Sukoharjo. Dinamika Hukum, 13(2), 104-118.
Qadri, M. A., & Sukma, D. P. (2024). Peran aparat kepolisian menangani tindak pidana kekerasan dalam rumah tangga (KDRT). CAUSA: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan, 8(8), 1-8.
Rahardjo, S. (2009). Penegakan hukum: Suatu tinjauan sosiologis. Genta Publishing.
Rossevelt, F. A., Aisyah, D., Nadeak, P. C. U., Zahrahni, N., Dwiriani, P. N., Achmad, N. F., Siregar, H. A., Simamora, V. A., & Siallagan, A. F. M. (2023). Analisis pengaruh budaya patriarki terhadap kekerasan perempuan di dalam rumah tangga. SAJJANA: Public Administration Review, 1(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.32734/sajjana.v1i2.19627
Soekanto, S. (2006). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum. Rajawali Pers.
Soekanto, S. (2019). Sosiologi: Suatu pengantar. Rajawali Pers.
Suhartini, A., Asba, P., & Balla, H. (2023). Peran penyidik kepolisian dalam penanganan tindak pidana kekerasan dalam rumah tangga. Jurnal Litigasi Amsir, 10(2), 158-166.
Tan, J. (2024). Tindakan kekerasan dalam rumah tangga yang terjadi di Indonesia dalam perspektif Undang-Undang PKDRT dan KUHP baru. Aurelia: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia, 3(1), 490-495.
Utama, I. M. A. (2007). Hukum lingkungan. Pustaka Sutra.
Wahyu, V. A. D., Junita, A. E., Amanda, D., Setyabudi, K. A., Daini, F. N., & Laksio, F. H. B. (2024). Analisis kinerja penyelidikan dan penyidikan dalam menanggulangi tindak pidana kriminal di Polres Karanganyar. Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora, 1(2), 50-62.
Wardhani, K. A. P. (2021). Perlindungan hukum terhadap perempuan korban kekerasan dalam rumah tangga (KDRT) pada tingkat penyidikan berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 23 Tahun 2004 tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga (UUPKDRT). Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, 1(1), 21-31.
Zahra, S. (2023). Dampak kekerasan dalam rumah tangga serta relevansinya terhadap hak asasi manusia: Studi kasus Mega Suryani Dewi tahun 2023. Jurnal Gema Keadilan, 10(1), 1115-1126. https://repositorio.ufsc.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/167638/341506.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
