Peran Komisi Pemberantas Korupsi (KPK) Dalam Menangani Kasus Korupsi di Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/humif.v2i2.1535Keywords:
Corruption Eradication Commission, corruption crime, corruption eradication, asset confiscation, transparencyAbstract
The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) plays a crucial role in combating corruption in Indonesia. This institution was established to address various corruption cases involving public officials, with the aim of increasing transparency, accountability, and justice in government administration. However, KPK faces numerous challenges in carrying out its duties, such as revisions to laws that limit its authority and obstacles in coordination with other law enforcement agencies. The factors causing corruption in Indonesia are complex, including weak oversight, a permissive culture towards corruption, and lack of transparency in state budget management. KPK not only focuses on taking action against corruption perpetrators but also strives to recover state losses through asset confiscation mechanisms. Despite this, KPK's effectiveness in combating corruption is often hindered by both internal and external challenges. Therefore, it is important to continuously strengthen coordination among law enforcement agencies and encourage legal reforms to enhance this institution. With stronger commitment from all parties, corruption eradication in Indonesia can be more effective, leading to a clean government free from corruption practices.
References
Alhakim, A., & Chai, V. D. (2023). Tindak pidana korupsi terkait dengan pendistribusian pupuk bersubsidi di Indonesia. Jatiswara, 38(3), 340–350.
Bambang Hartono, & Zainudin Hasan. (2021). Implementasi pertanggungjawaban pelaku tindak pidana korupsi dalam penyalahgunaan anggaran pendahuluan.
Damayanti, A., Muhammad, A., & Tando, C. E. (2023). Implementasi sinergitas aparat penegak hukum dalam proses penyidikan tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling (JPDK), 5(1), 6009–6013.
Fernanda, S. Z. (2024). Dampak revisi Undang-Undang KPK terhadap independensi dan efektivitas KPK dalam pemberantasan korupsi. PALAR (Pakuan Law Review), 10(2), 133–141.
Jannah, M., Kurniaty, Y., Hakim, H. A., & Basri, B. (2024). Analisis kepatuhan dan kesadaran hukum pegawai KPK terhadap efektivitas penegakan hukum. Borobudur Law and Society Journal, 3(3), 119–128.
Mutia, R. (2024). Analisis tindak pidana penggelapan dalam jabatan oleh pejabat umum (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Kalimantan MAB).
Rahmawati, I., Bambang Hartono, & Zainudin Hasan. (2021). Akibat hukum putusan pra peradilan terhadap penetapan tersangka dugaan melakukan tindak pidana korupsi di Sekretariat DPRD Tulang Bawang. Fundamental: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 10(1), 1–17.
Vinata, L. P., & Zulfiani, A. (n.d.). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi dan upaya pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi.
Zainudin Hasan, Azra, A. H., Ramadhani, S., & Praptisia, M. L. P. (2025). Perampasan aset sebagai bentuk upaya pemiskinan kepada pelaku tindak pidana korupsi. Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Negara, 3(1), 68–77.
Zainudin Hasan. (2023). Perkembangan sistem peradilan pidana di beberapa negara. Dalam Buku Sistem Peradilan Pidana (hlm. 192–203).
Zainudin Hasan. (2025). Dampak korupsi terhadap penegakan hukum. Dalam Buku Pendidikan Anti Korupsi (hlm. 71–73).
Zainudin Hasan. (2025). Dampak masif korupsi. Dalam Buku Pendidikan Anti Korupsi (hlm. 54–55).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
