Diskursus Pertimbangan Hakim Terkait Studi Kejahatan Seksual Terhadap Pekerja Seks Komersial Anak

Authors

  • Fauzia Musdalifa Z. A. Nuna Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
  • Suwitno Yutye Imran Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
  • Jufriyanto Puluhulawa Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/progres.v1i1.63

Keywords:

Child Protection, Judge's Considerations, Victimology

Abstract

This research aims to determine and analyze the role and position of child victims in sexual crimes and legal protection efforts through victimology theory in normative decisions. Legal materials are collected through document study, then analyzed prescriptively. The research results found that there are regulations that have not been specifically regulated to protect children from all sexual crimes. Then, the role and position of the child victim which was not assessed as a consideration by the Judge in Decision Number 102/Pid.sus/2022/PN Lbo is something that hinders legal protection efforts for children. This research also contains victimology analysis of child victims using the Carroll Formula as well as other analyzes that show the victim's position as a commercial sex worker, which shows that there is a trigger for a crime. Victimology theory in decisions is important to understand the role of child victims who are considered passive perpetrators so that the theory of justice can be included in decisions and child protection through victimology theory can be implemented.

 

 

References

Jurnal:

Adhipradana, Y. "Urgensi Kriminalisasi bagi Pekerja Seks Komersial." Bureaucracy Journal: Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance 3, no. 2 (2023)

Anhusadar, Laode. "Evaluasi pelaksanaan standar produk hasil belajar pada satuan pendidikan anak usia dini." Al-TA'DIB: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Kependidikan 13, no. 1 (2020).

Yanto, O. “Prostitusi sebagai kejahatan terhadap eksploitasi anak yang bersifat ilegal dan melawan hak asasi manusia (the prostitution as the crime concerning exploitation of the children and against human rights)”. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 12(4), (2018).

Mansur, Dikdik M. Arief, and Elisatris Gultom. Urgensi perlindungan korban kejahatan: antara norma dan realita. Divisi Buku Perguruan Tinggi, RajaGrafindo Persada, 2007.

Putri, Annisa Anindya, Annie Myranika, and Tina Asmarawati. "Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Anak Korban Kejahatan Kekerasan Seksual." JURNAL PEMANDHU 4, no. 1 (2023).

Saputra, A., dkk. “Analisis Perkembangan Teori Viktimologi Terhadap Anak Sebagai Korban Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga”. Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin. 2(7). (2023).

Taosen, J., & Nurisman, E. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Anak Dibawah Umur Yang Dijadikan Pekerja Seks Komersial Di Kota Batam”. Legal Standing: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6(2), (2022).

Yogie, Yogie Indra Wahyudi, Diana Haiti, and Nurunnisa Nurunnisa. "Anak Sebagai Korban Pemerkosaan Dalam Teori Viktimologi." Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia 4, no. 2 (2023) Hlm

Undang-Undang:

Pemerintah Indonesia. Undang – Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2016 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang - Undang No. 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang – Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak.

Sumber Lain:

Direktori Putusan. Putusan No. 16/Pid.sus/2016/ PN SGR.

Putusan 102/Pid.sus/2022/PN Lbo

Downloads

Published

2024-03-18

How to Cite

Fauzia Musdalifa Z. A. Nuna, Suwitno Yutye Imran, & Jufriyanto Puluhulawa. (2024). Diskursus Pertimbangan Hakim Terkait Studi Kejahatan Seksual Terhadap Pekerja Seks Komersial Anak. Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik Dan Humaniora, 1(1), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.62383/progres.v1i1.63