Tinjauan Yuridis Mengenai Sanksi Terhadap Pelaku Pemasungan Orang Dengan Gangguan Jiwa (ODGJ)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/progres.v1i2.350Keywords:
Sanctions against perpertrators of shackling people with mental disorders (ODGJ)Abstract
Confinement still often occurs until now, especially to people with mental disorders (ODGJ), but ODGJ have the same rights as normal people in general. Some of their rights are the right to be free from torture or cruel treatment, free from exploitation and free from violence. Therefore, the act of shackling is not in accordance with our positive law. The main problems of this research are: (1) How is the juridical review of sanctions against perpetrators of shackling people with mental disorders (ODGJ)? (2) How is the ideal arrangement related to legal protection of victims of shackling people with mental disorders (ODGJ)? This research is a normative research using library research techniques and the results of this research are analyzed qualitatively.This research found several things: (1) The juridical review of the provisions of criminal sanctions for perpetrators of shackling people with mental disorders (ODGJ) has not been regulated in detail in Law Number 18/2014 on Mental Health. However, it is related to Article 333 of the Criminal Code on Deprivation of Independence, where individuals who act to confine or perpetrators of shackling can be subject to criminal sanctions in the form of 8 years imprisonment with the element of intentionally depriving someone of their freedom or acting unlawfully, a maximum of 9 years imprisonment if the action causes serious injury, and 12 years imprisonment if the victim dies. (2) The ideal arrangement related to the legal protection of victims of ODGJ confinement has been regulated in Law Number 18 Year 2014 on Mental Health which ensures that everyone has a high quality of life, mental health, free from stress, and other conditions that exacerbate mental problems. In Article 4 paragraph 1 of the Mental Health Law, legal protection of ODGJ as victims of confinement in stocks is carried out through several actions, namely: promotive, preventive, curative and rehabilitative.
References
Pemerintah Negara Republik Indonesia]. (1945). Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.
[Pemerintah Negara Republik Indonesia]. (2014). Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2014 Tentang Kesehatan Jiwa.
[Pemerintah Negara Republik Indonesia]. (2016). Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2016 Pasal 6 Huruf (d) Tentang Penyandang Disabilitas.
[Pemerintah Negara Republik Indonesia]. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Pasal 55 dan 56.
[Pemerintah Negara Republik Indonesia]. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Pasal 333.
Ali, Zainuddin. (2014). Filsafat Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Asa, Simplexius. (2015). Kriminalisasi Dalam Peraturan Daerah, Studi Terhadap PERDA Penanggulangan HIV & AIDS. Jogyakarta: LintangBooks Publisher.
Asa, Simplexius. (2022). Examining the Principle of Ignorantia Facti Excusat, Ignorantia Iuris Non Excusat in the Corruption Case Nizzadro Fabio. Jurnal Indonesia Law Review, 13(1). Available at: https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/ilrev/vol13/iss1/9.
Ashshofa, Burhan. (2010). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Chazawi, Adami. (2005). Pelajaran Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Departemen Kesehatan RI. (2000). Keperawatan Jiwa Teori dan Tindakan Keperawatan. Jakarta.
Fadhilah, Rizki. (2021). Perbuatan Pemasungan Terhadap Penderita Gangguan Jiwa Menurut Hukum Pidana Islam Dan UU Nomor 18 Tahun 2014 Tentang Kesehatan Jiwa. Skripsi, Universitas Islam Negeri.
Gregory, Tardi. (2014). The Democracy Manifesto. Journal of Parliamentary and Political Law. Thomson Reuters Canada Limited, Edisi November 2014, hlm.611. Available at: https://1.next.westlaw.com/Document.
Kemenkes RI. (2018). Riskesdas 2018. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan.
Marpaung, Leden. (2005). Tindak Pidana Terhadap Nyawa dan Tubuh. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
N, Daulima. (2014). Proses Pengembalian Keputusan Tindakan Pasung Oleh Keluarga Terhadap Pasien Gangguan Jiwa. Fakultas Keperawatan UI.
Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan. (2017). Nomor 54 Tahun 2017 Tentang Penanggulangan Pemasungan Orang Dengan Gangguan Jiwa.
Rahayu. (2010). Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.
Rasmawati. (2018). Studi Fenomenologi Pengalaman Hidup Orang Dengan Gangguan Jiwa Pasca Pasung Yang Mengalami Percaraian. Journal Of Islamic Nursing, 3(1).
Refahanda, Andalaras. (2018). Tindak Pemasungan Terhadap Penderita Gangguan Jiwa Sebagai Bentuk Suatu Kejahatan. Skripsi, Universitas Sriwijaya.
Shalsabila, Kharisma. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Orang Dengan Gangguan Jiwa (ODGJ) Sebagai Korban Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Dalam Prespektif Viktimologi. Skripsi, Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Soekanto Soerjono, & Sri Mahmudi. (2018). Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Depok: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Wakuyo, Bambang. (2002). Penelitian Hukum dan Praktek (Edisi Ketiga). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Widnyana, I Made. (2010). Asas-asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: PT Fikahati Aneska.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
