Penerapan Prinsip Piercing the Corporate Veil terhadap Pelanggaran Fiduciary Duty

Authors

  • Yessira Dianita Universitas Islam Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/progres.v2i3.2529

Keywords:

Corporate Law, Director's Responsibilities, Fiduciary Duty, Limited Liability Companies, Piercing the Corporate Veil

Abstract

This study examines the application of the Piercing the Corporate Veil doctrine in cases of fiduciary duty violations by the President Director of PT Bakara Bumi Energi, based on the Jakarta Central District Court Decision No. 451/Pdt.P/2019/PN.JKT.Pst. Using a normative juridical approach, the research analyzes primary and secondary legal sources, including Law No. 40 of 2007 on Limited Liability Companies and relevant court rulings. The findings reveal that the President Director's failure to provide transparent financial reports and operational information constitutes a breach of fiduciary duty, encompassing duties of loyalty and care, leading to financial losses such as tax arrears and reputational damage. Furthermore, this breach justifies the application of the Piercing the Corporate Veil doctrine to hold the director personally liable, as supported by similar judicial precedents. The study concludes that enforcing this doctrine enhances corporate governance and accountability, recommending clearer regulatory frameworks for broader application to directors and other corporate organs.

References

Angel, V., Tan, D., & Afdal, W. (2025). Revolution of piercing the corporate veil doctrine in England. Hang Tuah Law Journal, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.30649/htlj.v9i1.269

Arifin, A. P. S., & Sodikin, S. (2023). Penerapan prinsip fiduciary duty untuk mewujudkan good corporate governance dalam perseroan terbatas. Journal of Contemporary Law Studies, 2(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.47134/lawstudies.v2i2.3583

Claassen, R. (2018). Corporate responsibility and fiduciary duties: Reconsidering the nature of the corporation. Cambridge Journal of Law and Ethics.

Dewi, S. (2023). Perkembangan penerapan prinsip piercing the corporate veil dalam pelanggaran fiduciary duty yang dilakukan direksi perseroan terbatas. Aktualita: Jurnal Hukum, X(Y), halaman. https://ejournal.unisba.ac.id

Dhoni Martien, D. (2023). Hukum perusahaan. Rajawali Press.

Fuady, M. (2003). Perseroan terbatas: Paradigma baru. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Harahap, M. Y. (2009). Perseroan terbatas (Cet. 1). Sinar Grafika.

Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia. (2024). Data legalitas perseroan PT Bakara Bumi Energi. Sistem Administrasi Badan Hukum (SABH). https://ahu.go.id

Mulyana, A. N. (2023). Piercing the corporate veil: Dinamika regulasi dan praktik peradilan. Rajawali Press.

Munir Fuady, D. S., & L. M., M. H. (2014). Doktrin-doktrin modern dalam corporate law dan eksistensinya dalam hukum Indonesia. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat. (2019). Putusan No. 451/Pdt.P/2019/PN.JKT.Pst.

Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan. (2011). Putusan No. 313/Pdt.G/2011/PN.Jkt.Sel.

Pengadilan Tinggi Medan. (2016). Putusan No. 304/PDT/2016/PT.MDN.

Republik Indonesia. (2007). Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia.

Silvana, E. D., & Wicaksana, A. (2020). Pertanggungjawaban direksi dalam pelanggaran prinsip fiduciary duty. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, 10(1).

United Kingdom Supreme Court. (2013). VTB Capital Plc v. Nutritek International Corp and others [2013] UKSC.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Yessira Dianita. (2025). Penerapan Prinsip Piercing the Corporate Veil terhadap Pelanggaran Fiduciary Duty. Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik Dan Humaniora, 2(3), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.62383/progres.v2i3.2529