Analisis Unsur 'Tanpa Hak' dalam Delik Kesusilaan UU ITE dalam Kasus Revenge Porn
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/progres.v2i3.2491Keywords:
Consent Creation, Consent Distribution, Criminal Law, Revenge Porn, Victim ProtectionAbstract
The advancement of digital technology has created new opportunities for cybercrime, including revenge porn the non-consensual distribution of intimate content motivated by revenge. In Indonesia, such cases have surged significantly, predominantly affecting women of productive age, with multidimensional consequences including psychological trauma, social stigmatization, and job loss. This study analyzes the element 'without right' (tanpa hak) in Article 27 paragraph (1) of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE), which is both the core and the main source of legal uncertainty in prosecuting revenge porn cases. Through normative legal research using statute and case approaches, analyzing the Banten High Court Decision No. 96/Pid.Sus/2023/PT BTN, this research finds that the element 'without right' must be interpreted holistically by making a clear distinction between consent to create and consent to distribute. The appellate court decision demonstrates a progressive human rights-based approach, integrating the principle of reasonable expectation of privacy and victimological impacts. However, normative ambiguity continues to create disparities in rulings and disproportionate evidentiary burdens on victims. The research recommends legislative reform through amendment of the UU ITE or enactment of specific legislation on image-based sexual abuse to provide stronger legal certainty and substantive victim protection.
References
Arief, B. N. (2018). Bunga rampai kebijakan hukum pidana. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Feinberg, J. (1986). Harm to self. Oxford University Press.
Fuller, L. L. (1969). The morality of law. Yale University Press.
Hadjon, P. M. (1987). Perlindungan hukum bagi rakyat Indonesia: Sebuah studi tentang prinsip-prinsipnya. Bina Ilmu.
Hamzah, A. (2017). Asas-asas hukum pidana. Rineka Cipta.
Hart, H. L. A. (1961). The concept of law. Oxford University Press.
Henry, N., & Flynn, A. (2019). Image-based sexual abuse: A study on the causes and consequences of non-consensual nude or sexual imagery. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351135153
Hiariej, E. O. S. (2019). Prinsip-prinsip hukum pidana. Cahaya Atma Pustaka.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP).
Komnas Perempuan. (2023). Laporan tahunan kekerasan terhadap perempuan 2023: Korban bersuara, data bicara. Komnas Perempuan.
Mertokusumo, S. (2019). Mengenal hukum: Suatu pengantar. Liberty.
Nissenbaum, H. (2020). Privacy in context: Technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford University Press.
Otto, J. M. (2017). Governance and law: The distinctive context of transitions from conflict. Leiden University Press.
Pengadilan Negeri Pandeglang. (2023). Putusan Nomor 71/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Pdl.
Pengadilan Tinggi Banten. (2023). Putusan Nomor 96/Pid.Sus/2023/PT BTN.
Radbruch, G. (1950). Rechtsphilosophie. K. F. Koehler Verlag.
Remmelink, J. (2020). Hukum pidana: Komentar atas pasal-pasal terpenting dari Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Belanda dan padanannya dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Solove, D. J. (2008). Understanding privacy. Harvard University Press.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2024).
Zainuddin, M. (2022). Perlindungan hukum terhadap korban kejahatan. Kencana.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



