Implementasi Care Governance dalam Administrasi Publik: Studi Eksploratif Peran Aktor Non-Manusia pada Kebijakan Lingkungan Daerah

Authors

  • Riko Apriliano Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji (UMRAH)
  • Caesar Jourdy Permana Tauhid Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji (UMRAH)
  • Arik Prayoga Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji (UMRAH)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/progres.v2i3.2385

Keywords:

Actor Network Theory, Care Management, Environmental Management, Non-Human Actors, Public Administration

Abstract

This study examines the implementation of care governance in environmental public administration by highlighting the role of non-human actors. Based on Actor–Network Theory (ANT), exploratory qualitative research was conducted in the densely populated area of Tanjungpinang (April–June 2025). In environmental management, success is determined not only by technical skills, but also by the capacity of citizens to manage digital documents, spatial data, and technological infrastructure. Through interviews, observations, and document analysis. This approach was chosen because it allows for in-depth exploration of complex, contextual, and previously unstudied social phenomena, especially in the context of care governance to involve the relationship between humans and non-human objects in the local government ecosystem. Findings show that flood sensors, digital SOPs, inter-agency WhatsApp groups, and monitoring dashboards function as actors that trigger, direct, and accelerate coordination and decision-making. The integration of sensors and dashboards automates early warnings and the distribution of instructions, enabling rapid response. Implications: digital systems need to be designed as administrative actors with ethics, accountability, and capacity building. This study concludes that the implementation of care governance in environmental public administration at the local level cannot be separated from the active role of non-human actors such as flood sensors, digital documents, and online communication systems. Findings show that entities Findings show that these entities function not only as technical tools, but also as an integral part of a decision-making network capable of directing, accelerating, and streamlining administrative responses to environmental situations.

References

Ahyar, M., Niswaty, R., & Baharuddin, A. (2025). Care governance: Administrasi publik di era antroposen. Efisiensi: Kajian Ilmu Administrasi. https://doi.org/10.21831/efisiensi.v22i1.79336

Alvarez-Rosete, A. (2025). An empirical investigation of governance arrangements in 5 leading international integrated care systems. International Journal of Integrated Care, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.ICIC24118

Chen, R., & Zhang, X. (2021). The landscape of non-state actors and China environmental governance: Illustrative roadmaps to processes and institutions. In Non-state actors in China and global environmental governance (pp. 50–90). Springer.

Diver, S., Vaughan, M., & Baker-Medard, M. (2024). Collaborative care in environmental governance: Restoring reciprocal relations and community self-determination. Ecology and Society, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-14488-290107

Drumbl, M. A., & Uhlířová, K. (2021). Actors and law-making in international environmental law. In International environmental law (2nd ed., pp. 2–44). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786439710

Duan, C., & Silaban, D. (2023). Edukasi pelestarian lingkungan hijau di Sekolah Dasar Katolik Witihama. Selaparang: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Berkemajuan, 7(3), 1726–1731. https://doi.org/10.31764/jpmb.v7i3.16627

Fajriah, A., Chahyono, C., & Abubakar, H. (2021). Analisis motivasi dan lingkungan organisasi terhadap penerapan good corporate governance melalui kepemimpinan pada Sekretariat Kabupaten Mamuju Tengah. Indonesian Journal of Business and Management. https://doi.org/10.35965/jbm.v4i1.1201

Green, J. (2018). Transnational delegation in global environmental governance: When do non‐state actors govern? Regulation & Governance, 12, 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12141

Heidtmann, K., & Selck, T. (2021). Local level failure? Non-compliance of EU environmental policy within EU multi-level governance. Regional & Federal Studies, 34, 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2021.1998006

Ivanova, D., Wallenburg, I., & Bal, R. (2016). Care in place: A case study of assembling a carescape. Sociology of Health & Illness, 38(8), 1336–1349. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.1247

Kapucu, N. (2010). Managing complex governance systems: Dynamics, self-organization, and coevolution in public investments. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 12, 347–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876981003737074

Luton, L. (2020). Research methods: Qualitative methods. In Encyclopedia of public administration and public policy (3rd ed., p. 7). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1081/E-Epap3-120052751

Martin, D. (2020). Place as human–environment network. In The Routledge handbook of place (pp. 109–117). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429453267-9

Masuda, H., & Castañeda-Ayarza, J. (2021). Actor-network theory as a method for evaluating the energy sectors. International Journal of Management Practice, 12(5). https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v12i5.1343

Morin, J.-F., Orsini, A., & Jinnah, S. (2020). Non-state actors. In Global environmental politics: Understanding the governance of the earth (1st ed., pp. 126–160). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198826088.003.0004

Muñiz-Martínez, N. (2025). Extending actor engagement: Human–environmental engagement in multilevel socioecological systems. Journal of Service Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-02-2023-0052

Rachmaniar, & Susanti, S. (2021). Studi etnografi virtual tentang keberadaan penggiat lingkungan dalam WhatsApp group non lingkungan. Komuniti: Jurnal Komunikasi dan Teknologi Informasi, 13(2), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.23917/komuniti.v13i2.16034

Sugiartha, I. N. G., & Nugraha, P. W. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban administratif pengelolaan lingkungan hidup berbasis partisipasi masyarakat untuk pembangunan berkelanjutan di Bali. Jurnal Hukum Saraswati (JHS), 3(2). https://doi.org/10.36733/jhshs.v3i2.2950

Utami, T., Hasmika, H., & Fitriana, D. (2024). Pembentukan karakter peduli lingkungan: Studi Adiwiyata. Vox Edukasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.31932/ve.v15i2.3837

Yuwita, F., Wulandari, S., & Gusriani, I. (2025). Sosialisasi strategi pengembangan pemasaran digital kelompok perempuan peduli lingkungan Sumber Jaya dan Sejahtera di Kabupaten Rejang Lebong Bengkulu. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Multidisiplin, 8(1), 170–177. https://doi.org/10.36341/jpm.v8i2.55655

Downloads

Published

2025-09-12

How to Cite

Riko Apriliano, Caesar Jourdy Permana Tauhid, & Arik Prayoga. (2025). Implementasi Care Governance dalam Administrasi Publik: Studi Eksploratif Peran Aktor Non-Manusia pada Kebijakan Lingkungan Daerah. Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik Dan Humaniora, 2(3), 09–18. https://doi.org/10.62383/progres.v2i3.2385