Reformasi Politik dan Kewenangan Presiden: Analisis Kritis terhadap Peran Instruksi Presiden dalam Pembentukan Kebijakan Nasional

Muh Fakhri B. Katili; Riyanto Moonti; Roy Marthen Moonti; Muslim A. Kasim

doi:10.62383/progres.v2i2.2057

Authors

Muh Fakhri B. Katili Universitas Gorontalo
Riyanto Moonti Universitas Gorontalo
Roy Marthen Moonti Universitas Gorontalo
Muslim A. Kasim Universitas Gorontalo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/progres.v2i2.2057

Keywords:

olitical reform, presidential authority, Presidential Instruction

Abstract

Political reform in Indonesia has brought fundamental changes to the structure of state governance and the decision-making process within the executive branch. One of the instruments still frequently utilized by the President to formulate and direct national policy is the Presidential Instruction (Instruksi Presiden/Inpres). Although it is not classified as a formal regulation within the legal hierarchy, Inpres often has wide-reaching implications for the implementation of public policy. This study aims to critically analyze the legal status, function, and limitations of Inpres in the context of Indonesia’s post-reform government system. Using a normative-juridical approach and literature study of statutory regulations and policy documents, the research finds that the use of Inpres in several instances has extended beyond its administrative function and entered the domain of strategic policymaking, which ideally requires formal legislative processes. This raises concerns regarding accountability, transparency, and the limitation of executive power in a democratic rule-of-law state. The study recommends clearer regulation of the scope and function of Inpres to ensure alignment with political reform principles and good governance standards.

References

Akademika, J., & Tio, T. (2023). Kekuasaan Jokowi dalam Perspektif Michel Foucault. 5(2).

Asshiddiqi, J. (2011). Perihal Undang-Undang. Rajawali Pers.

Aziz, A., & Zakir, S. (2022). Indonesian Research Journal on Education : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan. 2(3), 1030–1037.

Faturohman, F., Afifah, H., & Sari, M. (2024). Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) Terhadap Wanita Yang Menjadi Korban Pemerkosaan Dan Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan. Ilmu Hukum Sosial Dan Humaniora, 1(2).

Hafifah Dinda Pratiwi, Sunarto, T. L. (2019). Diskriminasi Gender terhadap Jurnalis Perempuan di Media. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(1), 1–14.

Hamdani, F., Fauzia, A., Fiqri, M. R., & Putra, E. A. M. (2024). Telaah Kritis Alasan di Balik Terbitnya Instruksi Presiden Nomor 1 Tahun 2022. MULTIPLE: Journal of Global and Multidisciplinary, 2(2), 1248–1260.

Hukum, F., & Tarumanagara, U. (2025). Rewang Rencang : Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis. Vol.5. No.10 (2024) Tema/Edisi : Filsafat, Politik dan Etika Profesi Hukum (Bulan Kesepuluh) https://jhlg.rewangrencang.com/. 5(10), 1–18.

Hutagalung, J. M., & Gloriawati, T. (2023). Konsep Politik Legislasi Hukum Keluarga Di Indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Ilmiah, 23(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.31599/jki.v23i1.932

M Almudawar, & Ichsanoodin Mufty Muthahari. (2021). Penanganan dan Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia terhadap Pengungsi (Refugees) dan Pencari Suaka (Asylum Seekers) di Indonesia Sesuai Pengkajian Perpres 125 Tahun 2016 dan Implementasi Peran Rumah Detensi Imigrasi dalam Penanganan Pengungsi di Luar Negeri pa. Perspektif Hukum, 108–122. https://doi.org/10.30649/ph.v21i2.71

Muslim A Kasim (Universitas Gorotalo), Roy Marthen Moonti (Universitas Gorontalo), N. I. (Universitas G. (2024). PENERAPAN SISTEM PRESIDENTIAL THERESHOLD TERHADAP AMBANG BATAS PENCALONAN PRESIDEN DAN WAKIL PRESIDEN TAHUN 2019 DALAM PRESPEKTIF HUKUM TATA NEGARA. JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana, Vol 6 No 2. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.46930/jurnalrectum.v6i2.3389.

Satrya Surya Pratama. (2022). Urgensi Penerapan Instruksi Presiden Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 Pada Pelaksanaan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 8(2), 570–581. https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v8i2.51861

Yunus, N. R. (2021). (2021), “Disartikulasi Fungsi Hukum; Dari Alat Perekayasa Sosial Hingga Perekayasa Kebijakan Politik”, Mizan: Journal of Islamic Law Memonitor pikiran Satjipto tentang hukum sebagai alat rekayasa sosial, namun mengingatkan adanya risiko politisasi hukum.