Pemberhentian Direktur Tanpa Kesempatan Membela Diri Melalui RUPSLB

Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 143/Pid.B/LH/2020/PN Sdw

Authors

  • Kaltzum Salzabiela A Paseng Universitas Islam Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/progres.v2i1.1315

Keywords:

Directors, Self-Defense, Dismissal

Abstract

The dismissal of a director from his position, based on article 105, is carried out through a GMS. According to article 78 of the PT Law, a GMS consists of an annual GMS and other GMS. Other GMS, as explained in article 78 paragraph 1, in practice, are known as Extraordinary GMS (EGMS). Unlike the annual GMS, an EGMS can be held at any time, based on the needs for the benefit of the company. Based on the trial facts in the decision of the West Kutai District Court regarding the discovery of facts about the dismissal and replacement of directors at PT Sendawar Adhi Karya. It is known that the dismissal and replacement of Agus Basuki from the position of director of PT Sendawar Adhi Karya is not in accordance with the mechanism regulated in the provisions of Law number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies. Thus, the provisions in the articles of association regarding changes to the management structure of PT Sendawar Adhi Karya are considered never to have existed.

References

Azhar, M. R. (2016). Fiduciary duty dalam hukum korporasi Indonesia. Jakarta: Penerbit PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Isfardiyana, S. H. (2015). Tanggung jawab direksi perseroan terbatas dalam pelanggaran fiduciary duty. Padjajaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(1), 168–191.

Lismayanti, E., Purwaningsih, E., & Yusuf, C. (2023). Legalitas tindakan direksi perseroan terbatas. Jurnal Res Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(2), 193–212. https://doi.org/10.46306/rj.v3i2

Pradipto, N., Kartika, C. R., & Kusuma, A. J. (2022). Pemberhentian terhadap direksi perseroan terbatas dalam kepailitan melalui circular resolution. Jurnal Suara Hukum, 4(1), 86–106.

Purwantri, P. R. (2014). Tanggung jawab direksi berdasarkan prinsip fiduciary duties dalam perseroan terbatas. Kerthaka Smawaya, 2(4), 1–6.

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Kutai Barat, Nomor 143/Pid.B/LH/2020/PN Sdw.

Rahmah, U. F. (2023). Kewenangan direksi dalam pengurusan perseroan terbatas. Lex Economica Journal, 1(1), 55–67.

Syarief, E., & Balqist, A. (2017). Doktrin fiduciary duty dan corporate opportunity terhadap pertanggungjawaban direksi dan dewan komisaris. Journal of Law and Policy Transformation, 2(2), 80–102.

Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas.

Wowor, R. D., Kalalo, M. E., & Tampongangoy, G. H. (2023). Akibat hukum pengangkatan direksi tanpa RUPS menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas. Lex Privatum, XI(2), 1–11.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-06

How to Cite

Kaltzum Salzabiela A Paseng. (2025). Pemberhentian Direktur Tanpa Kesempatan Membela Diri Melalui RUPSLB: Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 143/Pid.B/LH/2020/PN Sdw. Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik Dan Humaniora, 2(1), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.62383/progres.v2i1.1315