Tanggung Jawab Penerbit dan Manajer Investasi Terhadap Kasus Gagal Bayar (Default) Dana Investasi Reksadana Yang Dialami Investor

Studi Kasus PT. Tridomain Performance Materials Tbk

Authors

  • Juan Dicky A. Sukatendel Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Yudho Taruno Muryanto Universitas Sebelas Maret

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/progres.v1i1.116

Keywords:

Mutual Fund, Default, Legal Liability

Abstract

The capital market is an important part of representing the country's economic conditions. In the capital market there are several instruments that are traded, one of which is mutual funds. Mutual funds are quite an attractive option for the community, but there are cases of default that make mutual fund investors suffer losses. This research uses a normative juridical approach method, namely library legal research conducted by examining library materials or secondary data as a basis for research by conducting a search for laws and literature related to the problems studied. Legal protection can be done by using preventive and repressive legal protection in mutual fund investment cases as a form of protection to investors from the government. The losses suffered by investors due to the default of PT TDPM to MMI, indicate that TDPM has a responsibility that can be in the form of paying all obligations and compensation and accepting all sanctions that can be in the form of administrative, civil, to criminal. Preventive legal protection can be seen in the existence of laws and regulations such as the Capital Market Law, P2SK Law, POJK 48/2015, POJK 31/2015, and others. Repressive legal protection is in the form of enforcement of sanctions from administrative even to bankruptcy. Responsibility must be carried out by TDPM, namely paying obligations along with interest according to the debt restructuring agreement until the imposition of sanctions. And it is necessary to see the form of MMI's responsibility as the Investment Manager in this case.

References

Buku

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2023). BUKU SAKU PASAR MODAL. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan.

Jurnal

Adhianto, R. D. (2020). Investasi Reksa Dana Sebagai Alternatif InvestasiBagi Investor Pemula. Jurnal E-Bis (Ekonomi-Bisnis), 4(1), 32–44.

Andriani, F. (2020). NVESTASI REKSADANA SYARIAH DI INDONESIA ISLAMIC MUTUAL FUND INVESTMENT IN INDONESIA. AT-TIJARAH: Jurnal Penelitian Keuangan Dan Perbankan Syariah, 2(1), 44–65.

Aristawati, L., Suriatmadja, T. T., & Siska, F. (2022). Kerugian Investor yang Diakibatkan Gagal Bayar Dana Investasi Reksa Dana oleh Manajer Investasi Menurut Peraturan di Bidang Pasar Modal. Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies, 2(1), 808–813.

Asriati, A., & Baddu, S. (2021). Investasi Online Reksadana: Aspek Hukum dan Perlindungan Bagi Investor selaku Konsumen. PLENO JURE, 10(1), 38–53. https://doi.org/10.37541/plenojure.v10i1.561

Dyani, V. A. (2017). Pertanggungjawaban Hukum dan Perlindungan Hukum bagi Notaris dalam Membuat Party Acte. Lex Renaissance, 2(1), 162–176.

Herman, E. (2015). ANALISIS TANGGUNG JAWAB BANK TERHADAP NASABAH PADA PRODUK INVESTASI REKSADANA. JOM Fakultas Hukum, 2(2), 1–15.

Klaudia, S., Rohmah, T. N., Devi, Y. V., & Ayu, C. R. L. (2018). MENAKAR PENGARUH RISIKO, RETURN, PEMAHAMAN INVESTASI, DAN MODAL INVESTASI TERHADAP MINAT UMKM DALAM MEMILIH JENIS INVESTASI. Jurnal PETA, 3(1), 109–124.

Kowanda, F., & Suherman. (2021). 1057JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan HumanioraISSNCetak:2354-9033|ISSN Online :2579-9398http://jurnal.um-tapsel.ac.id/index.php/Justitia| Vol. 8No. 5Tahun 2021PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM INVESTOR REKSADANA TERHADAP MANAJER INVESTASI GAGAL BAYAR DALAM KONTRAK INVESTASI KOLEKTIF. JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora, 8(5), 1057–1066.

Mahyuda, I. S., Putri, F. R., & Putri, B. S. (2021). Urgensi Reksadana sebagai Salah Satu Opsi Investasi untuk Meningkatkan Jumlah Investor di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 5(3), 11088–110093.

TRISNAYADI, M. (2021). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP INVESTOR DALAM PERDAGANGAN REKSADANA DI PASAR MODAL. AKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS MATARAM, i–xiii.

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1995 Tentang Pasar Modal.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 21 Tahun 2011 Tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK)

Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2023 Tentang Pengembangan dan Penguatan Sektor Keuangan.

Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 48/POJK.04/2015 Tentang Pedoman Pengelolaan Reksa Dana Terproteksi, Reksa Dana Dengan Penjaminan, dan Reksa Dana Indeks.

Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 17 Tahun 2022 tentang Pedoman Perilaku Manajer Investasi.

Website

Pengertian Perlindungan Hukum dan Penegakan Hukum - pinterhukum, diakses diakses pada 21 November 2023, pukul 10.30 WIB.

Perlindungan Hukum: Pengertian, Unsur, dan Contohnya (hukumonline.com), diakses pada 21 November 2023, pukul 11.30 WIB

http://tesishukum.com/pengertian-perlindungan-hukum-menurut-para-ahli/ diakses pada 21 November 2023 pukul 13.45 WIB.

Surat Utang Tridomain Gagal Bayar, Mandiri Investasi Lakukan Langkah Ini (bareksa.com), diakses pada 21 November 2023 pukul 11.45 WIB.

PowerPoint Presentation (ksei.co.id), diakses pada 19 November 2023 pukul 14.40 WIB.

Gagal Bayar, Tridomain Resmi Berstatus PKPU 45 Hari - Korporasi Katadata.co.id, diakses 18 November 2023 pukul 09.00 WIB.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-31

How to Cite

Juan Dicky A. Sukatendel, & Yudho Taruno Muryanto. (2024). Tanggung Jawab Penerbit dan Manajer Investasi Terhadap Kasus Gagal Bayar (Default) Dana Investasi Reksadana Yang Dialami Investor : Studi Kasus PT. Tridomain Performance Materials Tbk. Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik Dan Humaniora, 1(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.62383/progres.v1i1.116