Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Dokter Umum Terkait Pelimpahan Wewenang Tindakan Medik dari Dokter Spesialis Menurut Omnibus Law Kesehatan 2023

Authors

  • Jaury Douglas Pardomuan Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta
  • Handoyo Prasetyo Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/jembatan.v1i3.411

Keywords:

Regulations, Minister of Health Regulation, Specialist Doctors, Omnibus Law

Abstract

In carrying out their duties, general practitioners have limitations both in terms of knowledge and medical facilities they possess. Furthermore, based on the Omnibus Health Law 2023, there are regulations that govern general practitioners regarding the medical procedures they can and cannot perform. Several articles that regulate referral issues are Article 19, Article 32, Article 189, and Article 360. Meanwhile, the regulation regarding specialist doctors is listed in Articles 233-235. However, it is important to emphasize that the authority of specialist doctors and general practitioners is not directly regulated in the Omnibus Law. Thus, the study that can be conducted is an interpretative study that compares it simultaneously with similar legal products. Other references that can be used are Presidential Regulation no. 31 of 2019 and Minister of Health Regulation no. 36 of 2019. Based on a comparative study and judicial analysis of the Omnibus Health Law 2023, specialist doctors have their own independence, and therefore, if they delegate authority to general practitioners, it is guaranteed by the law, including the Omnibus Health Law 2023, especially because the Omnibus Health Law 2023 opens up flexibility for specialist doctors to practice. If delegation occurs, general practitioners can be legally protected as long as the basis for this delegation is emergency for patient safety, secondly is the delegation of authority to ensure patient safety, and thirdly is part of the education for specialist doctors. Although not explicitly stated, these implications are strongly implied in the articles mentioned in the Omnibus Health Law. Nevertheless, there are certain limits that specialist doctors must follow to ensure that patients' rights are well protected, and in the future, there needs to be a strengthening of regulations so that both general practitioners and specialist doctors do not face criminalization.

References

Aditama, T. Y. (2023). Aspek Pendidikan Dalam Rancangan Undang-Undang Kesehatan. EJournal Kedokteran Indonesia, 1–2.

Adnani, N. T. S., Syofyan, S., & Mannas, Y. A. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Dokter Program Pendidikan Dokter Spesialis (PPDS) Terhadap Pelimpahan Wewenang Dokter Spesialis dalam Pelayanan Medis di Rumah Sakit (Studi Kasus di Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Dr. M. Djamil Padang Bagian Obstetri dan Ginekologi). UNES Law Review, 6(1), 1209–1216.

Dandel, E. F. (2022). Aspek Hukum Pelanggaran Kode Etik Mengenai Rahasia Kedokteran. Lex Crimen, 10(12).

Effendi, A. M. (2023). Pandangan Dalam Hukum Kesehatan Pada Kasus Malpraktik. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Prima, 6(2), 254–262.

Hardiyanto. (2023). Legal Development in the Field of Health Transformation Reviewed From the Legal Regulation System in Indonesia. Jurnal Lawnesia, 2(2), 392–402.

Harmoni, D., Indrayuni, D., Das’at, Z., & Triana, Y. (2022). Tanggung Jawab Rumah Sakit Atas Kelalaian Tenaga Kesehatan Dalam Pelayanan Kegawatdaruratan Medik. Humantech: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia, 2(01), 137–148.

Henseler, C. (2021). Finding Humanity. The Scholar as Human: Research and Teaching for Public Impact, 129.

Hidayat, S., Haris, O. K., & Linda, N. Y. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana terhadap Kelalaian Dokter Muda (Co-Assistant) dalam Penanganan Kegawatdaruratan. Halu Oleo Legal Research, 5(2), 692–703.

Ibrahim, D. N. (2022). Tanggung Jawab Hukum Rumah Sakit Terhadap Dokter Dalam Perjanjian Medis Di Indonesia (Studi: Rumah Sakit Siaga Raya). Jurnal Ilmiah Publika, 10(2), 275–288.

Ichsan, B. (2022). Pengantar metodologi penelitian kedokteran dan kesehatan masyarakat. Muhammadiyah University Press.

Makins, N. (2023). Patients, doctors and risk attitudes. Journal of Medical Ethics, 49(11), 737–741.

Pallocci, M., Treglia, M., Passalacqua, P., Tittarelli, R., Zanovello, C., De Luca, L., Caparrelli, V., De Luna, V., Cisterna, A. M., & Quintavalle, G. (2023). Informed Consent: Legal Obligation or Cornerstone of the Care Relationship? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(3), 2118.

Pangkal Masalah Seretnya Pasokan Dokter Spesialis di Indonesia - Analisis Data Katadata. (n.d.). Retrieved April 3, 2024, from https://katadata.co.id/analisisdata/63be7b2197cfb/pangkal-masalah-seretnya-pasokan-dokter-spesialis-di-indonesia

Pramudito, D., & Widjaja, G. (2022). Tanggung Jawab Hukum dalam Pelimpahan Wewenang Beda Profesi Kesehatan. Cross-Border, 5(1), 365–384.

Prayuti, Y., Dewangga, R. C., Parikesit, K. H., Subhan, M., & Yuanita, Y. (2023). Aspek Hukum Dalam Kontrak Pelayanan Kesehatan: Studi Kasus Mengenai Kewajiban dan Hak Pasien. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(6), 5525–5533.

Putra, F. M. D. (2023). Pembaruan Uu Praktik Kedokteran Kaitannya Dengan Kriminalisasi Dokter Pada Kasus Malpraktik Di Indonesia. MAGISTRA Law Review, 4(01), 63–75.

Rozaliyani, A., Meilia, P. D. I., & Librianty, N. (2018). Prinsip Penetapan Sanksi bagi Pelanggaran Etik Kedokteran. Jurnal Etika Kedokteran Indonesia, 2(1), 19.

Sumeru, F. A. K., & Tanawijaya, H. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Diskresi Tindakan Medis dalam Kondisi Kedaruratan yang Dianggap sebagai Tindakan Malpraktek Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Praktik Kedokteran. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling (JPDK), 5(1), 460–467.

Susetiyo, W., & Iftitah, A. (2021). Peranan dan Tanggungjawab Pemerintah dalam Pelayanan Kesehatan Pasca Berlakunya UU Cipta Kerja. Jurnal Supremasi, 11(September 2012), 92–106. https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v11i2.1648

Theunissen, L. N. (2020). The Value of Humanity. Oxford University Press.

Triana, Y., Winarsi, S., Khairul, F., & Ningsih, N. (2023). Tinjauan Hukum Pelimpahan Wewenang Dokter Kepada Profesi Perawat Dalam Tindakan Medis. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling (JPDK), 5(1), 768–777.

Wahyuwono, D. D., Hanadi, S., & Utami, N. A. T. (2021). Kesadaran Hukum Dokter terhadap Kode Etik Kedokteran Indonesia dalam Upaya Peningkatan Kesehatan (Studi di Rumah Sakit Hermina Purwokerto). Soedirman Law Review, 3(2).

Yuarsa, T. A. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Dokter Atas Pelimpahan Kewenangan Medis Dokter Spesialis Kepada Dokter Jaga Di Rumah Sakit. Syiar Hukum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 17(2), 166–187. https://doi.org/10.29313/shjih.v17i2.5400

Yunianti, S., & Darmawan, E. S. (2023). Kebijakan Adaptasi Dokter Spesialis Warga Negara Indonesia Lulusan Luar Negeri Di Fasilitas Pelayanan Kesehatan. Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika ISSN 2721-4796 (Online), 3(2), 984–998.

Vidi Galenso Syarief. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Tenaga Medis Dan Tenaga Kesehatan Melalui Majelis Yang Dibentuk Menteri Kesehatan Pasca Undang-Undang Kesehatan Omnibus Law. Collegium Studiosum Journal, 6(1), 336–343. https://doi.org/10.56301/csj.v6i1.933

Published

2024-06-20

How to Cite

Jaury Douglas Pardomuan, & Handoyo Prasetyo. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Dokter Umum Terkait Pelimpahan Wewenang Tindakan Medik dari Dokter Spesialis Menurut Omnibus Law Kesehatan 2023. Jembatan Hukum : Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial Dan Administrasi Negara, 1(3), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.62383/jembatan.v1i3.411