Peran Kepolisian dalam Pengendalian terhadap Penyampaian Pendapat di Muka Umum di Kota Medan

Authors

  • Supardi Sitinjak Universitas Muslim Nusantara Al Washliyah
  • Muhammad Ridwan Lubis Universitas Muslim Nusantara Al Washliyah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/jembatan.v3i1.2943

Keywords:

Counter-Terrorism, Gegana Detachment, Mitigation, North Sumatra Police, Terrorism

Abstract

Terrorism is a serious threat to the security and unity of the Indonesian nation. Events such as the suicide bombing at the Medan Police Headquarters in 2019 show that acts of terror are increasingly complex and require swift and appropriate handling. For this reason, the government passed Law Number 5 of 2018 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Terrorism as a legal basis that strengthens the authority of the apparatus, including the Gegana Detachment of the Indonesian National Police Mobile Brigade Corps (Brimob), in carrying out counter-terrorism operations. This study aims to determine and analyze how the implementation of Law No. 5 of 2018 is carried out by the Gegana Detachment in the North Sumatra Regional Police area, identify obstacles faced in operations, and formulate strategies to increase the effectiveness of the implementation of the law. The results of the study show that the implementation of this law has been implemented through preventive, preemptive, and repressive approaches, such as sterilization of places of worship, social activities "Love Sunday", security patrols, and anti-terror training simulations. However, implementation in the field still faces various obstacles, including limited modern equipment, lack of cross-agency coordination, and low public participation. Therefore, personnel capacity building, infrastructure modernization, and strengthening inter-agency synergy are needed to achieve more effective counterterrorism efforts in North Sumatra.

References

Arief, B. N. (2008). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana (1st ed.). Prenada Media Group.

Fuady, M. (2005). Sumpah Hippocrates: Aspek Hukum Malpraktek Dokter. PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Google Search. (n.d.). Contoh demo anarkis.

Hadjon, P. M. (1987). Perlindungan hukum bagi rakyat Indonesia. Bina Ilmu.

Hamzah, A. (2005). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.

Hukumonline. (n.d.). Bunyi Pasal 170 KUHP tentang pengeroyokan.

Kaban, K. (2023). Analisis kriminologi terhadap keterlibatan wanita dalam peredaran gelap narkotika. Universitas Darma Agung Jurnal, 3746-325-8759-1-10-20230908.

Lamintang, P. A. F. (1984). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana. Sinar Baru.

Peraturan Disiplin Anggota Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia (PP No. 2 TH 2003). Menetapkan norma dan aturan disiplin bagi anggota Polri.

Peraturan Kepala Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2009 tentang Implementasi Prinsip Dan Standar Hak Asasi Manusia.

Sinaga, L. V. (2019). Pelaksanaan tugas kepolisian dalam penanggulangan konflik sosial di wilayah Polda Sumut. Jurnal Rectum, 1(2), 201-209. https://doi.org/10.46930/jurnalrectum.v1i2.229

Soekanto, S. (2013). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Soetrisno, S. (2010). Malpraktek Medik dan Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. PT Telaga Ilmu Indonesia.

Sudarto. (1990). Hukum Pidana I. Yayasan Sudarto.

Supriadi, W. C. (2001). Hukum Kedokteran. Mandar Maju.

Tutik, T. T., & Febriana, S. (2010). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pasien. Prestasi Pustaka.

Undang-Undang No. 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia. Mengatur tugas pokok dan kewenangan Polri sebagai alat negara untuk menjaga keamanan dan ketertiban masyarakat.

Waluyo, B. (2011). Viktimologi Perlindungan Korban & Saksi. Sinar Grafika.

Yutanto, A., & Helmi. (n.d.). Hukum Pidana Malpraktik Medik.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-17

How to Cite

Supardi Sitinjak, & Muhammad Ridwan Lubis. (2026). Peran Kepolisian dalam Pengendalian terhadap Penyampaian Pendapat di Muka Umum di Kota Medan. Jembatan Hukum : Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial Dan Administrasi Negara, 3(1), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.62383/jembatan.v3i1.2943