Model for Combating Child Criminal Offenses Thru the Development of a Legal Culture Based on Pancasila

Authors

  • Kartika Asmanda Putri Universitas Slamet Riyadi
  • Endang Yuliana Susilawati Universitas Slamet Riyadi
  • Nimas Yuski Nur Laili Universitas Slamet Riyadi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/jembatan.v2i4.2772

Keywords:

Child Criminal Law, Child Criminal Offenses, Legal Culture, Pancasila, Restorative Justice, Social Justice

Abstract

The increasing number of children facing the law in Indonesia indicates that the repressive legal approach has not been fully effective in addressing juvenile crime. Children, as subjects of law, have social and psychological characteristics that differ from adults, so law enforcement against them must consider humanitarian and educational aspects. This research aims to analyze the factors causing children to commit criminal acts and formulate a model for addressing them based on developing a legal culture rooted in Pancasila values. This research employs a normative juridical method with conceptual and legislative approaches, and analyzes data qualitatively thru literature review and positive legal norms. The research findings indicate that the causes of children committing criminal acts are multidimensional, encompassing family factors, social environment, education, economics, and psychological factors. Therefore, mitigation efforts cannot be done partially, but must be thru a preventive, educational, and restorative approach. This research offers a model for overcoming challenges thru the development of a legal culture based on five main pillars: family, education, society, the state, and the legal system. This model emphasizes the importance of synergy between law enforcement and moral development in accordance with the values of Divinity, Humanity, Unity, Deliberation, and Social Justice. Thus, the development of Pancasila legal culture is expected to realize a child criminal justice system that is humanistic, substantively just, and oriented toward social rehabilitation in accordance with the legal ideals of a Pancasila state of law.

References

Bazemore, G., & Umbreit, M. (1995). Rethinking the sanctioning function in juvenile court: Retributive or restorative responses to youth crime. Crime & Delinquency, 41(3), 296-316.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128795041003002

Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative justice and responsive regulation. Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195136395.001.0001

Carrington, K., Dixon, B., & Zajdow, G. (2018). Youth justice and culture: New perspectives on crime and justice. Theoretical Criminology, 22(2), 237-254.

Daly, K. (2006). The limits of restorative justice. In The handbook of restorative justice (pp. 134-145).

Freeman, M. D. A. (2011). Children's rights and the developing law (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Friedman, L. M. (2006). The legal system: A social science perspective. Law & Society Review, 40(3), 527-540.

Gavrielides, T. (2008). Restorative justice—the perplexing concept: Conceptual fault-lines and power battles within the restorative justice movement. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 8(2), 165-183.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895808088993

Goldson, B., & Hughes, G. (2010). Sociological criminology and youth justice: Comparative policy analysis and local governance. Youth Justice, 10(2), 125-142.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895810364460

Haines, K., & Case, S. (2015). Positive youth justice: Children first, offenders second. Youth Justice, 15(1), 3-17.

https://doi.org/10.51952/9781447321729.int001

Hart, S. N., Pavlovic, Z., & Zeidner, M. (2014). The role of character education in preventing juvenile delinquency. Journal of Moral Education, 43(4), 481-495.

Hopkins, B. (2016). Restorative approaches in schools: Enhancing youth well-being and legal awareness. Educational Psychology in Practice, 32(3), 227-241.

Johnstone, G., & Van Ness, D. W. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook of restorative justice. Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781843926191

Lenta, P. (2020). Legal culture and moral development: Reconsidering the role of law in shaping youth behavior. Journal of Legal Education, 69(2), 273-295.

Roche, D. (2003). Accountability in restorative justice. Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199259359.001.0001

Sherman, L. W., & Strang, H. (2007). Restorative justice: The evidence. The Smith Institute.

Tyler, T. R. (2010). Legitimacy in corrections: Policy implications. Criminology & Public Policy, 9(1), 127-134.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2010.00615.x

Umbreit, M. S., Vos, B., Coates, R. B., & Lightfoot, E. (2005). Restorative justice in the twenty-first century: A social movement full of opportunities and pitfalls. Marquette Law Review, 89(2), 251-303.

Zehr, H. (2015). The little book of restorative justice. Good Books.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Kartika Asmanda Putri, Endang Yuliana Susilawati, & Nimas Yuski Nur Laili. (2025). Model for Combating Child Criminal Offenses Thru the Development of a Legal Culture Based on Pancasila. Jembatan Hukum : Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial Dan Administrasi Negara, 2(4), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.62383/jembatan.v2i4.2772