Legal Review of the Execution of Mortgage Rights on Land
(Study of Constitutional Court Decision Number 10/PUU-XIX/2021)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/jembatan.v2i4.2598Keywords:
Constitutional Court, Debtor, Legal Protection, Mortgage, Parate ExecutieAbstract
The execution of mortgage rights on land is a crucial element in the property security legal system in Indonesia, which allows creditors to obtain debt repayment if the debtor defaults. However, the implementation of parate executie as a non-litigious mechanism based on Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights has sparked constitutional debates, particularly regarding the debtor's right to fair legal protection. This study analyzes the legal considerations of the Constitutional Court in Decision No. 10/PUU-XIX/2021, which rejected the constitutional review of the mortgage execution norms, and evaluates the legal execution procedures post-decision. Using the normative legal research method, this article examines the approach of contractual freedom, the principle of justice, and the protection of property rights in the context of creditor-debtor relationships. The study results show that the Court views parate executie as constitutionally valid, as long as it is carried out with the principles of transparency, proportionality, and the availability of legal recourse for the debtor. Therefore, legal protection within the mortgage system is not eliminated, but must be implemented through accountable and just practices. These findings provide an important normative basis for policymakers and economic actors in ensuring that the execution of guarantees runs effectively while still upholding the constitutional rights of the parties involved.
References
Asshiddiqie, J. (2021). Constitutional law and the Constitutional Court. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. (2021). Constitutional Court Decision No. 10/PUU-XIX/2021. Jakarta: General Secretariat of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. (2022). Compilation of Constitutional Court decisions in the field of civil law 2021–2022. Jakarta: Research Center of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
Dewi, P. A., & Sari, M. (2021). The implementation of mortgage execution in the perspective of civil law. Ius Quia Iustum Law Journal, 28(3), 457–478. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol28.iss3.art5
Directorate General of State Assets. (2021). Technical guidelines for the execution of mortgage auctions. Jakarta: Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia.
Fuady, M. (2020). Debt guarantee law. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Ginting, M. S. (2021). Parate execution of collateral rights in national guarantee law. Journal of Law & Development, 51(2), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol51.no2.2939
Hakim, R. M. (2020). The implementation of the principle of justice in the execution of collateral rights after the Constitutional Court Decision No. 10/PUU-XIX/2021. Constitutional Journal, 17(4), 633–648. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1744
Huda, N. (2020). The role of the Constitutional Court in interpreting constitutional rights to ownership. Jurnal Konstitusi, 17(1), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1715
Khairandy, R. (2021). The issue of the execution rights of separate creditors post-MK decision. Indonesian Legislative Journal, 18(2), 211–228.
Komnas HAM. (2021). Guide to property rights protection in the process of executing collateral. Jakarta: Komnas HAM RI.
Kurniawan, B. (2021). Legal analysis of the debtor's rights in collateral execution. Prioris Law Journal, 11(1), 80–95. https://doi.org/10.25077/prioris.v11n1.2021.80-95
Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Normative legal research method. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Meliala, D. S. (2020). Execution of mortgage rights in the Indonesian civil law system. Journal of Law & Business, 9(2), 198–214. https://doi.org/10.24843/JHB.2020.v09.i02.p04
Minister of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia. (2020). Regulation of the Minister of Finance No. 213/PMK.06/2020 on auction implementation guidelines. Jakarta: Ministry of Finance.
Munir, A. (2022). The influence of the implementation of parate executie on the constitutional rights of debtors. Jurnal Konstitusi, 19(1), 100–118.
Nurmala, D., & Putra, R. A. (2021). Comparison of mortgage execution and fiduciary guarantee. Jurnal Hukum Replik, 9(3), 327–345.
Rahman, A. (2020). Legal protection for debtors in parate execution. Jurnal Yustisia, 9(1), 35–50.
Rasjidi, L., & Putra, I. B. W. (2021). Fundamentals of legal theory. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Rasyid, M. (2020). Justice in the execution of property guarantees. Yogyakarta: UII Press.
Sembiring, H. (2021). The legal implications of the Constitutional Court’s decision on collateral rights. Indonesian Journal of Constitutional Law, 2(2), 155–173.
Simanjuntak, D. A. (2020). Juridical interpretation of Article 6 of the UUHT post-MK decision. Jurnal Yuridika, 35(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.20473/jy.v35i2.2020.215-232
Siregar, R. (2020). The role of auction officials in the implementation of collateral rights post-reform. Pro Justitia Law Journal, 8(3), 190–205.
Susanti, H. (2021). The constitutional rights of debtors in the parate executie system. Jurnal Hukum Konstitusional, 10(4), 285–303.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
