Penyalahgunaan Kewenangan Oleh Aparat Desa Ditinjau Dari Aspek Pidana
(Putusan Pn Gorontalo Nomor 1/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2020/Pn Gto)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/jembatan.v1i2.236Keywords:
Corruption Crime, Abuse of Authority, Financial LossesAbstract
This research is intended to: (1) find out how the review of the imposition of criminal sanctions for abuse of authority by village officials is based on the Gorontalo District Court Decision Number 1/Pid.Sus TPK/2020/PN Gto, and (2) find out what factors influence the imposition of crimes on Gorontalo District Court Decision Number 1/Pid.Sus-TPK/2020/PN Gto. This research uses a type of normative legal research that uses legal norms, including statutory regulations, doctrine, and judge's decisions as a foundation for providing arguments. The approach models used are the statutory approach, case approach and conceptual approach.
The research results show: first decision no. 1/Pid.Sus TPK/2020/PN Gto, is not completely correct because prison sentences tend to be low and do not comply with legal principles and harm the sense of justice in society. Apart from that, the implications of the judge's decision in decision no. 1/Pid.Sus TPK/2020/PN Gto, if examined from the perspective of the principles of justice, expediency and legal certainty, these principles have not been fully implemented because it can be seen from the low number of judges' sentences against defendants. Second, the factors influencing the imposition of criminal sanctions in case no. 1/Pid.Sus TPK/2020/PN Gto, it was the absence of aggravating reasons applied by the panel of judges, and the public's perception or opinion of the defendant not being considered, which resulted in the sanction imposed being only 3 (three) years in prison.
References
Anti Korupsi, 3.1 (2013)
Syamsuddin, Ahmad Rustan, ‘Pembuktian Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa’, Jambura Law Review, 2.2 (2020) <https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v2i2.5942>
Wantu, Fence. M, ‘Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan Dan Kemanfaatan Dalam Putusan Hakim Di Peradilan Perdata’, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 12.3 (2012)
Wijaya, Ahmad, and Nasran Nasran, ‘Comparison Of Judicial Review: A Critical Approach To The Model In Several Countries’, JURNAL LEGALITAS, 14.2 (2021) <https://doi.org/10.33756/jelta.v14i2.11809>
Wijayanto, Dody Eko, ‘HUBUNGAN KEPALA DESA DENGAN BADAN PERMUSYAWARATAN DESA DALAM PEMBENTUKAN PERATURAN DESA’, Jurnal Independent, 2.1 (2014) <https://doi.org/10.30736/ji.v2i1.17>
Produk Hukum :
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 Pasal 1 Ayat (1).
Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia No. 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Desa.
Undang-undang RI Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman, Pasal 5 ayat (1).
Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Nomor 732 Tahun 1915.
Undang-Undang No. 28 Tahun 1999 Tentang Penyelenggaraan Negara Yang Bersih Dan Bebas Dari Korupsi, Kolusi Dan Nepotisme.
Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 2002 Tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Undang-Undang No. 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sebagaimana Telah Diubah Dengan UU No. 20 Tahun 2001.
Undang-Undang No. 46 Tahun 2009 Tentang Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Pasal 12B Ayat (1).
Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 Tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
