Tourism Sector Development Policy in Increasing Local Income in Gresik Regency

Authors

  • Fawaz Nurul Widad Farahani Universitas Dr. Soetomo
  • Ika Devy Pramudiana Universitas Dr. Soetomo
  • Dian Ferriswara Universitas Dr. Soetomo
  • Sri Kamariyah Universitas Dr. Soetomo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/jembatan.v2i3.2248

Keywords:

Gresik Regency, Policy, Regional Original Revenue, Sustainable Tourism, Tourism

Abstract

This study examines tourism development policies and their contribution to increasing Regional Original Revenue (PAD) in Gresik Regency. The research specifically analyzes policy implementation, supporting and inhibiting factors, and their implications for local economic growth. Employing a qualitative descriptive approach, data were collected from key informants within the Gresik Regency Government, including the Office of Culture, Tourism, Youth, and Sports, as well as relevant supporting agencies. Primary data were supplemented with secondary sources, and analysis was conducted using McNabb’s (2002) model, which involves data grouping, interpretation, and the formulation of generalizable insights. Findings indicate that tourism development policies in Gresik Regency focus on five key areas: designation and spatial planning of tourism zones, development of tourist attractions and supporting infrastructure, promotion of tourism activities, and business development initiatives. These policies are supported by government regulations, community involvement, improved facilities, diversified tourism destinations, and marketing strategies utilizing both online and offline media. However, several inhibiting factors were identified, including limited funding, inadequate human resources, lack of cooperation with third parties, negative public perceptions, and insufficient knowledge about tourism potential. Overall, tourism in Gresik Regency demonstrates significant potential to enhance PAD, given its diverse natural, cultural, and religious attractions. The study concludes that strengthening collaboration, improving human resource capacity, and increasing promotional efforts are essential for optimizing tourism’s contribution to sustainable regional economic development. Future research should explore quantitative measurements of tourism's economic impact to validate the qualitative findings. Additionally, implementing performance-based budgeting for tourism programs may improve resource allocation and accountability.

References

Abidin, S. Z. (2005). Kebijakan publik. Jakarta: Suara Bebas.

Akıncı, Z., & Öksüz, E. (2022). Local people's view on tourism in context of sustainable tourism principles: An importance-performance analysis. Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR), 10(4), 501–529. https://doi.org/10.30519/ahtr.894259

Anastasia, H. R., & Suji. (2014). Kebijakan pengembangan pariwisata berbasis democratic governance. Surabaya: Pustaka Radja.

Budiardjo, M. (2000). Dasar-dasar ilmu politik. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Byrd, E. (2007). Stakeholders in sustainable tourism development and their roles: Applying stakeholder theory to sustainable tourism development. Tourism Review, 62(2), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1108/16605370780000309

Finsterbusch, K., & Motz, A. B. (1990). Social research for policy decisions. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Islamy, M. I. (1997). Prinsip-prinsip perumusan kebijakan negara. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Kaho, J. R. (2002). Prospek otonomi daerah di negara Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Kuntariningsih, A., Marhendi, M., Risyanti, Y., Samtono, S., Supriyanto, S., Supriyadi, A., ... & Soehari, H. (2023). The potential of sustainability aspects for development of tourism sector in Central Java. ICTMT, 1(2), 628–639. https://doi.org/10.56910/ictmt.v1i2.138

Martein, D., Untari, D., Berliana, D., Kunti, I., Wanti, T., & Rihamza, W. (2022). Speculative hypotheses on political direction of tourism law in Indonesia: Community base tourism (CBT) development. Journal of Economic Development Environment and People, 11(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.26458/jedep.v1i1.741

McNabb, D. E. (2002). Research methods in public administration and nonprofit management: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.

Muluk, K. (2009). Desentralisasi pemerintah dan daerah. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.

Parmawati, R., Pangestuti, E., Wike, W., & Hardyansah, R. (2020). Sustainable tourism on Red Island Beach, Banyuwangi: An analysis of RAPFISH-MDS (Multi-Dimensional Scaling). https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.23-10-2019.2293035

Parsons, W. (2005). Public policy: Pengantar teori dan praktik analisis kebijakan. Jakarta: Kencana.

Ridho, D. M., & Marseto. (2023). Analisis pengaruh pariwisata terhadap pendapatan asli daerah di Kabupaten Gresik tahun 2010–2021. Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis Manajemen Prima, 4(2), 72–82.

Spillane, J. J. (1987). Ekonomi pariwisata: Sejarah dan prospeknya. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Suwantoro, G. (2004). Dasar-dasar pariwisata. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Taufik, M., Ibrahim, M., Ahmad, B., Suni, M., & Nur, M. (2023). Collaborative government in tourism sector development. KNE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i17.14148

Winarno, B. (2002). Teori dan proses kebijakan publik. Yogyakarta: Media Pressindo.

Wulandari, S., & Afriyanni, A. (2021). Tourism development policy and their impact on the regional economy in the Riau Islands Province. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(2), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.293-305

Yoeti, O. A. (1999). Perencanaan dan pengembangan pariwisata. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-21

How to Cite

Fawaz Nurul Widad Farahani, Ika Devy Pramudiana, Dian Ferriswara, & Sri Kamariyah. (2025). Tourism Sector Development Policy in Increasing Local Income in Gresik Regency. Jembatan Hukum : Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial Dan Administrasi Negara, 2(3), 74–89. https://doi.org/10.62383/jembatan.v2i3.2248