Pembentukan Peradilan Agraria sebagai Instrumen Hukum Administrasi Negara dalam Penyelesaian Konflik HGU Perkebunan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/jembatan.v2i2.1733Keywords:
Agrarian Conflict, Cultivation Rights (HGU), Agrarian CourtAbstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the sociological conditions of the HGU conflict, and to analyze the need for the establishment of an Agrarian Court from a legal and social aspect. The method used in this study is the Sociolegal method, which combines law with social reality. Primary data was taken from interviews with farmers, residents affected by HGU, BPN officials, Secondary data was obtained from laws and regulations, court decisions, NGO reports, land documents. Mesuji Regency is an area in Lampung Province which is known as one of the chronic agrarian conflict areas in Indonesia, especially those involving the Right to Cultivate (HGU) by large plantation companies including PT Barat Selatan Makmur Investindo (BSMI) and PT Silva Inhutani. This conflict involves local communities and companies holding HGU. The root of the problem is the community's claim to customary land, cultivated land, or inherited land. Allegations of HGU expansion that exceed the permit limit. The conclusion of this study is that the resolution process is often ineffective, unfair, and slow. HGU conflicts are generally structural in nature, because they involve inequality between local communities and large corporations that receive legal legitimacy through the granting of HGU. The establishment of an Agrarian Court has the potential to be a more just, effective, and contextual solution to resolving plantation HGU conflicts.
References
Ariyanto, A. (2019). Reforma agraria dan konflik pertanahan di Indonesia: Kajian yuridis-sosiologis. Rajawali Pers.
Badan Pertanahan Nasional. (2016). Laporan status pertanahan Indonesia 2016. Jakarta: Badan Pertanahan Nasional.
Elman, C. (2005). The role of legal pluralism in conflict resolution: A case study of land rights in Indonesia. Oxford University Press.
Fitzpatrick, D. (2007). Land, custom and the state in post-Suharto Indonesia: A foreign lawyer’s perspective. In T. Lindsey (Ed.), Indonesia: Law and Society (2nd ed., pp. 131–160). Federation Press.
Klein, R. L., & Oliva, M. A. (2010). Corporate land grabbing and human rights: Legal and social challenges in agrarian conflict areas. Journal of International Law, 15(2), 102–125.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1976). Selected works in one volume. Progress Publishers.
Rahardjo, S. (2000). Hukum progresif: Hukum yang membebaskan. Kompas.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.
Sumaryono, A., & Hartono, P. (2019). Keadilan agraria dalam perspektif hukum Indonesia: Mengkritisi kebijakan pemerintah dalam pengelolaan tanah negara. Pustaka Agra.
Sumber, N., & Faizal, M. (2017). Conflict and reconciliation in land tenure disputes in Indonesia: The case of Mesuji. In C. Simons & S. T. Rahman (Eds.), Disputes over land and agrarian justice (pp. 98–120). Oxford University Press.
Sutiyoso, B. (2014). Keadilan agraria dan konsep peradilan khusus pertanahan. Jurnal Hukum IUS, 2(3), 374–387. https://doi.org/10.1234/ius.v2i3.123
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria (UUPA).
Warren, C. (2005). Community mapping, tenurial rights and conflict resolution in Kalimantan. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 46(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8373.2005.00261.x
Wolfe, P. (2016). Land, labor, and colonialism: The case of agrarian conflicts in Southeast Asia. Oxford University Press.
Zen, H. (2020). Mendorong pembentukan Peradilan Agraria: Strategi dan tantangan. Epistema Institute.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



