Pembuktian Unsur Kesengajaan dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berdasarkan Pasal 338 KUHP

(Studi Putusan No 122/Pid.B/2021/PN.Sit)

Authors

  • Hindriyani Hindriyani Universitas Ibrahimy
  • Heriyanto Heriyanto Universitas Ibrahimy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/jembatan.v1i4.1404

Keywords:

Criminal Act, Evidence, Intention

Abstract

The crime of murder is a crime that can cause the death of a person, this is committed individually and violates the applicable provisions of the Criminal Code Book II Chapter XIX (articles 338-350). Basically, murder is carried out with an element of intent. Deliberation is a subjective element in a criminal act, because this element is inherent in the subject or perpetrator of the crime. This means wanting or knowing what will be done. Therefore, in murder there must be evidence in order to determine whether a person is guilty or not in committing the crime of murder by collecting legal evidence according to the applicable law. Furthermore, the method used in this case is a normative juridical approach, which is carried out through literature books, journals, articles, as well as statutory regulations related to the problem to be discussed. Legal considerations in imposing a sentence on the perpetrator of the crime of intentional murder, because the circumstances were aggravating and the defendant caused the victim to die and the defendant's actions disturbed the community. Thus, the punishment given by the state is solely to change the perpetrator to become better, and at the same time provide education to improve themselves.

References

Ali Imron. (2019). Hukum Pembuktian. UNPAM Press.

Arto, M. (2004). Praktek Perkara Perdata pada Pengadilan Agama (5th ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.

Batas, E. M. (2016). Tindak pidana pembunuhan berencana menurut Pasal 340 KUHP. Lex Crimen, 5(2).

CDM, I. G. A. D. L., Yuliartini, N. P. R., & Mangku, D. G. S. (2020). Penjatuhan sanksi terhadap pelaku tindak pidana pembunuhan. Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia, 3(1), 48-58.

Dairani, D. (2021). Argumentasi hukum dan upaya mempertahankan eksistensi Pancasila sebagai sumber dari segala sumber hukum negara. HUKMY: Jurnal Hukum, 1(1), 19-34.

Imron, A. (2019). Hukum Pembuktian. Tangerang Selatan: UNPAM Press.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP) Pasal 184.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Pasal 338, 340, 344.

Kurniawan, Y. S., Chandra, T. Y., & Basuki, B. (2024). Kepastian hukum pembuktian motif pada tindak pidana pembunuhan berencana. ARMADA: Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin, 2(8), 680-690.

Mentari, B. M. R. (2020). Saksi pidana pembunuhan dalam KUHP dan hukum Islam. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 23(1), 1-38.

Roosa, J. (2008). Dalih pembunuhan massal: Gerakan 30 September dan kudeta Suharto. Nobodycorp.

Sianturi, S. R. (1986). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana dan Penerapannya. Alumni AHAEM-PTHAEM.

Sitepu, S. (2011). Pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan pidana terhadap pelaku tindak pidana pembunuhan berencana (Disertasi, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta).

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2019). Global study on homicide: Gender-related killing of women and girls. United Nations.

Widodo, W. (2015). Pelaksanaan pilkada berdasarkan asas demokrasi dan nilai-nilai Pancasila. Civis: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan, 5(1), 30-45.

World Health Organization (WHO). (2014). Violence prevention: The evidence. WHO Press.

Yusuf, I. (2013). Pembunuhan dalam perspektif hukum Islam. Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari'ah dan Masyarakat, 13(2), 1-12.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Hindriyani Hindriyani, & Heriyanto Heriyanto. (2024). Pembuktian Unsur Kesengajaan dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berdasarkan Pasal 338 KUHP : (Studi Putusan No 122/Pid.B/2021/PN.Sit). Jembatan Hukum : Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial Dan Administrasi Negara, 1(4), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.62383/jembatan.v1i4.1404