Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Jaminan Harta Pihak Ketiga dalam Kepailitan yang Dijadikan Harta Pailit Oleh Kurator

Authors

  • Safirah Maharani Putri Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Iblam
  • Muhammad Rizal Rustam Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Iblam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/jembatan.v2i1.1220

Keywords:

Bankruptcy, Third Party Assets, Curator, Legal Remedies, Legal Protection

Abstract

In bankruptcy proceedings, the presence of third parties whose assets are made part of the bankruptcy estate often leads to legal conflicts. The bankruptcy estate is a collection of assets managed by the curator to pay off the debtor's obligations to creditors. Problems arise when third-party assets, which should not be included in the bankruptcy estate, are included without a clear legal basis. This research aims to analyze the legal remedies that can be taken by third parties to protect their rights and interests. By reviewing the provisions in the Bankruptcy Law, as well as the prevailing practice, this study demonstrates the importance of verification of assets by the curator prior to inclusion in the bankruptcy estate. Legal procedures such as opposition (verzet) can be taken by third parties to challenge the curator's decision in the commercial court. The findings of this study highlight the need for a better understanding of third party rights and the legal mechanisms in place to prevent abuse of curator authority. It is hoped that this study will provide guidance to third parties in taking appropriate legal steps and strengthening legal protection in the bankruptcy process.

References

Aditya Rizal Ranovianto, & Lyanthi, M. E. (2024). Tanggung jawab perdata atas tindakan lalai kurator dalam kepengurusan harta pailit (Boedel Pailit). Journal Publicuho, 7(3), 1054–1064. https://doi.org/10.35817/publicuho.v7i3.457

Atikah, I. (2022). Metode penelitian hukum. Haura Utama.

Bursa Advotaces. (2024). Pengertian dan fungsi kurator Indonesia dalam kepailitan. Bursadvocates.Com. Retrieved from https://bursadvocates.com/pengertian-dan-fungsi-kurator-indonesia-dalam-kepailitan/

Heriani, F. N. (2022). Pikul tanggung jawab besar, kurator tak boleh sembrono tangani perkara kepailitan. Hukumonline.Com. Retrieved from https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/kurator-pailit-lt61f1fde95805f/

Issue, V. I. X. (2021). Lex et Societatis, IX(3), 16–24.

Luh Gede Putu Purnawati, N., Nyoman Resa Adhika, I., & Wayan Gede Antok Setiawan Jodi, I. (2019). Pengaruh dukungan organisasi dan kepuasan kerja terhadap kinerja pegawai pada bagian umum Setda Kabupaten Tabanan. Widyadari, 20(1), 67–76.

Moh, I., & Mataram, S. (2024). Kurator sebagai eksekutor dalam penyelesaian kasus kepailitan. Curator and Executor in the Resolvement of Case Of, 9(1).

Muryati, D. T., Septiandani, D., & Yulistyowati, E. (2017). Pengaturan tanggung jawab kurator terhadap pengurusan dan pemberesan harta pailit dalam kaitannya dengan hak kreditor separatis. Jurnal Dinamika Sosial Budaya, 19(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.26623/jdsb.v19i1.682

Ningrum, R., Kurratu, D., & Nasichin, A. (2023). PAULIANA (Legal protection of good-intention third parties due to the application of the Actio Pauliana principles). 1(1–13).

Nugraha, R. M., Machmud, A., & Fuad, F. (2023). Akibat hukum terhadap aset milik pihak ketiga yang dijaminkan kepada kreditur dalam kepailitan. Binamulia Hukum, 12(1), 191–199. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v12i1.504

Oktavira, B. A. (2023). Kewenangan debitur atas hartanya yang bukan boedel pailit. Hukumonline.Com. Retrieved from https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/kewenangan-debitur-atas-hartanya-yang-bukan-boedel-pailit-lt653b70c744d4a/

Pratama, A. P., Istighfarin, S., & Iksir, A. S. (2023). Perlindungan hukum pada pihak ketiga sebagai pemilik objek jaminan hak tanggungan. DIH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 19(2), 99–109.

Sahrul, I. I., Candra, T. Y., & Pandiangan, R. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban pidana kurator pelaku penggunaan surat palsu dalam pengurusan harta pailit. Sentri: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 3(5), 2381–2389.

Saija, R. (2018). Penyalahgunaan keadaan dalam prosedur permohonan pailit di Pengadilan Niaga. Sasi, 24(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v24i1.114

Setyabudi, A. H., Janisriwati, S., & Windra Syahrial, I. (2023). Perlindungan hukum terhadap pihak ketiga dalam Actio Pauliana. Jurnal Magister Hukum ARGUMENTUM, 9(1), 119–127. https://doi.org/10.24123/argu.v9i1.5771

Suryanti, N., Faisal, P., & Muharani, S. (2022). Kedudukan aset milik pihak ketiga yang dijadikan sebagai boedel pailit oleh kurator berdasarkan UU Kepailitan dan UU Hak Tanggungan. Legal Spirit, 6(2), 207. https://doi.org/10.31328/ls.v6i2.4080

Syamsudin, S., Hafidz, M., & Baharuddin, H. (2021). Perlindungan hukum pihak ketiga terhadap jaminan kebendaan dalam harta pailit. Journal of Lex Generalis (JLS, 2(3), 1368–1379.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-14

How to Cite

Safirah Maharani Putri, & Muhammad Rizal Rustam. (2025). Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Jaminan Harta Pihak Ketiga dalam Kepailitan yang Dijadikan Harta Pailit Oleh Kurator. Jembatan Hukum : Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial Dan Administrasi Negara, 2(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.62383/jembatan.v2i1.1220