Perbedaan Angka Keberhasilan Pemasangan Laryngeal Mask Airway Antara Teknik Cuff Dikempiskan dan Dikembangkan Sebagian pada Pasien Dewasa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/ikg.v2i3.2096Keywords:
Laryngeal Mask Airway, General Anesthesia, Insertion SuccessAbstract
Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) insertion is an important part of airway management during general anesthesia. Two commonly used techniques are deflated cuff and partially inflated cuff. Choosing the right technique can increase the success rate of insertion and reduce complications such as air leaks or tissue trauma. This study aims to determine the difference in the success rate of laryngeal mask airway inserstion between deflated and partially inflated cuff techniques in adult patients at PKU Muhammadiyah Gamping Hospital. This study employed a quantitative method with a quasi-experimental design with a two group posttest only design. The sample consisted of 40 patients; and divided into two groups. Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test. The results showed that the partially inflated cuff technique had a higher success rate (75%) than the deflated cuff technique (25%). The statistical test showed a significant difference with a p value <0,05. There was a significant difference in the success of LMA insertion between the two techniques. The partially inflated cuff technique is more recommended to increase the effectiveness and safety of the procedure.
References
Aberra, B., Aregawi, A., Teklay, G., & Tasew, H. (2020). Effect of ketofol versus propofol as an induction agent on ease of laryngeal mask airway insertion conditions and hemodynamic stability in pediatrics: An observational prospective cohort study. BMC Anesthesiology, 19(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0711-0
Apriska Putri, F., Puspito, H., & Listyaningrum, T. H. (2022). Faktor yang mempengaruhi tingkat keberhasilan tindakan intubasi endotracheal tube selama intra anestesi pada pasien general anestesi: Literature review. https://digilib.unisayogya.ac.id/6335/
Emanuel, I. L., Suyasa, A. B., & S., D. A. (2020). Efektifitas bilateral packing pada pemasangan laryngeal mask. Jurnal Anestesi Perioperatif, 5(1), 26–33.
Jakni, S. P. (2016). Metodologi penelitian eksperimen bidang pendidikan. CV Alfabeta.
Marsaban, A. H., Martaria, N., Firdaus, R., & Cahyadi, A. (2014). Perbandingan kemudahan pemasangan laryngeal mask airway antara teknik baku disertai penekanan lidah dengan teknik baku. Anesthesia & Critical Care, 32(3), 178–185.
Millizia, A., Maghfirah, P., & Rizaldy, M. B. (2023). General anestesi pada tindakan esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Galenical: Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan Mahasiswa Malikussaleh, 2(4), 44. https://doi.org/10.29103/jkkmm.v2i4.10871
Mustika Sari, M., Saputra, M. H., & Puspito, H. (2024). Perbandingan angka keberhasilan pemasangan laryngeal mask airway (LMA) jenis klasik antara balon dikempiskan dan dikembangkan sebagian pada pasien dewasa. Jurnal Anestesi Perioperatif, 1(1), 30–35. https://doi.org/10.61132/vitamin.v1i1.993
Purba, B. A., Mafiana, R., & Puspita, Y. (2020). Perbandingan teknik insersi triple airway maneuver dengan teknik laringoskopi terhadap keberhasilan insersi dan profil hemodinamik pemasangan laryngeal mask airway (LMA) klasik pada operasi elektif. JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia), 11(2), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.14710/jai.v11i2.24457
Rahman, A., Fuadi, I., & Rachman, I. A. (2018). Perbandingan ketepatan ukuran classic laryngeal mask airway antara metode berat badan dan lebar lidah. Jurnal Anestesi Perioperatif, 6(3), 137–144. https://doi.org/10.15851/jap.v6n3.1338
Ronald D. Miller, Eriksson, L. I., & Fleisher, L. A. (2020). Miller’s anesthesia (9th ed.). Elsevier.
Shetabi, H., Shahriari, A., & Aghadavoudi, O. (2023). Conditions for insertion of the laryngeal mask airway in an innovative method vs the classic method. Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-140999
Simanjuntak, N. M., Oktaliansah, E., & Maskoen, T. T. (2016). Perbandingan teknik insersi klasik dengan teknik insersi triple airway manoeuvre terhadap angka keberhasilan dan kemudahan pemasangan laryngeal mask airway (LMA) klasik. Jurnal Anestesi Perioperatif, 4(3), 170–176. https://doi.org/10.15851/jap.v4n3.900
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kuantitatif. CV Alfabeta.
Tan, H. S., Li, S. Y., Yao, W. Y., Yuan, Y. J., Sultana, R., Han, N. L. R., Sia, A. T. H., & Sng, B. L. (2019). Association of Mallampati scoring on airway outcomes in women undergoing general anesthesia with SupremeTM laryngeal mask airway in cesarean section. BMC Anesthesiology, 19(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0796-5
Totonchi, Z., Seyed Siamdoust, S. A., Zaman, B., Rokhtabnak, F., & Alavi, S. A. (2022). Comparison of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion with and without muscle relaxant in pediatric anesthesia: A randomized clinical trial. Heliyon, 8(11), e11504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11504
Yustisa Sofirina Harahap, Tavianto, D., & Siregar, E. (2016). Perbandingan angka keberhasilan pemasangan laryngeal mask airway (LMA) jenis klasik pada usaha pertama antara teknik balon dikempiskan dan dikembangkan sebagian pada pasien dewasa. Jurnal Perspektif, 4(4), 519. https://doi.org/10.24036/perspektif.v4i4.466
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Inovasi Kesehatan Global
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
