Analisis Minat Peserta Didik di SD Negeri 179 Tambangan Untuk Belajar Aktif di Dalam Kelas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/edukasi.v2i1.1014Keywords:
Student interests, SD Negeri 179 Tambangan, Active learningAbstract
This study analyzes the interest of students at SD Negeri 179 Tambangan in being active in class. It also aims to analyze the factors that influence students' interest in using interactive and participatory learning methods. The method employed is a survey of 100 students from different classes. Data were collected using a questionnaire consisting of closed and open-ended questions regarding learning experiences, interest in classroom activities, and preferences for the applied learning methods. The analysis shows that the majority of students are very interested in active learning, with 75% of respondents stating that discussion activitiesandeducationalgamesenhancetheirmotivation.However,thereare also challenges, such as a lack of equipment and limited time to implement these programs. These results provide valuable insights for educators in makingpolicies to develop more effective learning strategies. An increase in student interest is expected to improve the quality of education at SD Negeri 179 Tambangan.
References
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Daniarsa, A. A. S. (2018). Minat peserta didik kelas IV dan V di SDN 1 Sardonoh Ngagik Sleman terhadap pembelajaran. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Wenderoth, M. P., & Dirks, C. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415.
Gagne, R. M., & Briggs, L. J. (1979). Principles of instructional design. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for research and practice. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 235–267). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ihsan, A. N., Fitriani, A., & Masrumin, M. A. (2023). Analisis minat belajar dalam pembelajaran matematika menggunakan media berbasis video. Jurnal Pendidikan Profesi Guru, 1(1), 85–88.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 95–105.
Kagan, S. (1994). Cooperative learning. San Juan Capistrano, CA: Kagan Cooperative Learning.
Karisma, E. T., Setiawan, D., & Oktavianti, I. (2022). Analisis minat belajar peserta didik pada pembelajaran di kelas IV SDN Jleper 01. Jurnal Prasasti Ilmu, 2(3).
Kuhlthau, C. C. (2004). Seeking meaning: A process approach to library and information services. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
Lusiyani, L. (2020). Analisis minat belajar peserta didik melalui pembelajaran Google Classroom pada masa pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 217–227.
Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strike rule against pure discovery learning? American Psychologist, 59(1), 14–19.
McCarthy, J. (2000). The role of the teacher in the constructivist classroom. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 123–145). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching & learning. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
O’Neill, G., & McMahon, T. (2005). Student-centered learning: What does it mean for students and lecturers? In G. O’Neill, S. Moore, & B. McMullin (Eds.), Emerging issues in the practice of university learning and teaching (pp. 27–36). Dublin: AISHE.
Piaget, J. (1976). The child and reality: Problems of genetic psychology. New York: Basic Books.
Pritchard, A. (2009). Ways of learning: Learning theories for the workplace. London: Routledge.
Resnick, L. B. (1987). Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 16(9), 13–20.
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective. Boston: Pearson.
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Torau, P. N. (2022). Analisis kesulitan membaca pada siswa kelas III SD. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 2(3), 380–399.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Edukasi Elita : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
