Kesalahan dalam Penulisan Proposal Skripsi Mahasiswa di Universitas 17 Agustus Semarang

Authors

  • Andhika Nanda Perdhana Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang
  • Novita Al Ihyak Dieni Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/dilan.v1i2.680

Keywords:

Case study, data validation, thesis proposal writing, writing errors, Universitas 17 Agustus Semarang

Abstract

This study aims to identify and analyze the common mistakes made by students in writing thesis proposals in the Education Program of Belief in God Almighty at Universitas 17 Agustus Semarang. The research employed a qualitative approach with a case study design, where data were collected through in-depth interviews, document analysis of thesis proposals, and direct observation. The findings revealed that students frequently struggle with formulating a clear research background, articulating specific research problems, and developing a comprehensive literature review. Additionally, challenges were found in data analysis and the validation of research results. The implications of this study suggest the need for more intensive and structured academic guidance to help students overcome these difficulties and improve the quality of their thesis proposals.

References

Anderson, J. (2017). Common Challenges in Writing Thesis Proposals. Journal of Educational Research, 45(3), 123–135.

Black, S. (2016). Methodological Issues in Educational Research. Educational Studies, 32(4), 567–580.

Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. National Academy Press.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Case, R. (1992). The Mind’s Staircase: Exploring the Conceptual Underpinnings of Children’s Thought and Knowledge. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage.

Dewey, J. (1933). How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process. D.C. Heath.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive–Developmental Inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.

Johnson, L. (2019). Effective Thesis Supervision. Journal of Higher Education, 68(1), 98–112

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Sage

Piaget, J. (1970). The Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child. Orion Press

Smith, P. (2020). Writing a Successful Thesis Proposal. Educational Researcher, 44(1), 67–79

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.

Williams, R. (2021). Challenges in Academic Writing. Journal of Academic Writing, 12(4), 234–248.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Sage.

Published

2024-05-31

How to Cite

Andhika Nanda Perdhana, & Novita Al Ihyak Dieni. (2024). Kesalahan dalam Penulisan Proposal Skripsi Mahasiswa di Universitas 17 Agustus Semarang. Dinamika Pembelajaran : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Bahasa, 1(2), 305–313. https://doi.org/10.62383/dilan.v1i2.680