Sejarah Perbandingan Manajemen Pendidikan

Authors

  • Retno Ambar Wati Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Soekarno Bengkulu
  • Atik Likai Tanjua Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Soekarno Bengkulu
  • Kristanti Olivia Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Soekarno Bengkulu
  • Asiyah Asiyah Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Soekarno Bengkulu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/dilan.v2i4.2398

Keywords:

Classical Management Theory, Educational Management, Eficiency and Innovation, Management Development Figures, Modern Management Theory

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the contribution of classical and modern management theories in establishing the foundations of educational management in Indonesia. The study focuses on Frederick W. Taylor's scientific management theory, Henri Fayol's administrative theory, Max Weber's bureaucracy theory, and Peter F. Drucker's modern management theory. The research method used is library research with a content analysis approach, which examines relevant literature in the form of books, journals, and articles. The results of the study show that Taylor emphasizes work efficiency through systematic procedures, Fayol emphasizes the importance of managerial functions (planning, organizing, directing, controlling), Weber emphasizes order and formal legitimacy through rational rules, while Drucker focuses more on achieving vision, innovation, and empowering people as knowledge workers. In general, the theories of Taylor, Fayol, and Weber provide a classical foundation for educational management with an orientation towards structure, efficiency, and rules, while Drucker provides a modern foundation that emphasizes flexibility, innovation, and social relevance. Thus, a combination of classical and modern theories can be used as a strategic basis to strengthen Indonesian educational management to be more adaptive in facing global challenges and the digital era.

References

Adler, P. S. (2023). Drucker’s knowledge workers and the future of educational management. Management Learning, 54(4), 521–539.

Albrow, M. (2023). Bureaucracy revisited: Rationality in contemporary organizations. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Arifin, I., & Barnawi. (2023). Manajemen pendidikan: Teori dan praktik di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.

Beetham, D. (2024). Bureaucracy (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.

Bush, T. (2023). Theories of educational leadership and management (5th ed.). London: Sage Publications.

Carroll, B., & Gillen, D. (2025). Revisiting Fayol: Administrative theory and its implications for schools. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 57(1), 67–82.

Craig, J. B., & Moores, K. (2024). The science of business. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Dimmock, C., & Goh, J. (2025). Leadership for educational change: Drucker’s relevance today. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 53(2), 310–328.

Djalilov, J. (2025). The evolution of management theory: A literature review. ACOPEN UMSIDA.

Drucker Institute. (2023). The Drucker difference in education. Claremont Graduate University.

Eacott, S. (2023). School leadership and the problem of objectives. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Fullan, M. (2023). Leading in a culture of change (Updated ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Gurr, D. (2024). Teachers as knowledge workers: Implications for school management. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 52(3), 411–430.

Hargreaves, A., & O’Connor, M. T. (2023). Well-being in schools: Three forces shaping 21st century education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hidayat, R., & Fitria, H. (2024). Drucker’s modern management and its application in Indonesian education. International Journal of Educational Development in Asia, 5(1), 55–70.

Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2023). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (11th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Maciariello, J. A. (2023). Drucker’s lost art of management. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Newton, C. (2024). Knowledge workers and education management: Revisiting Drucker in the digital era. Journal of Educational Change, 25(2), 187–204.

OpenStax. (2025). Principles of management. Houston: Rice University.

Prasojo, L. D., & Riyanto, Y. (2023). Birokrasi pendidikan dan akuntabilitas sekolah di Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Indonesia, 15(2), 112–127.

Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2023). Management (15th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education.

Sari, N. P., & Gunawan, I. (2024). Administrative management in Indonesian schools: Revisiting Fayol’s principles. Journal of Educational Management and Leadership, 9(1), 15–29.

Spillane, J. P. (2024). Distributed leadership and Drucker’s vision: A modern synthesis. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 23(1), 45–61.

Tilaar, H. A. R., & Nugroho, R. (2023). Kebijakan pendidikan: Kajian analisis implementasi di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Widiasarana.

Wilson, D., & Post, M. (2024). Classical and modern management approaches in schools: A comparative perspective. International Journal of Educational Management, 38(2), 245–263.

Witzel, M. (2024). A history of management thought. London: Routledge.

Wren, D. A., & Bedeian, A. G. (2023). The evolution of management thought (9th ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-17

How to Cite

Retno Ambar Wati, Atik Likai Tanjua, Kristanti Olivia, & Asiyah Asiyah. (2025). Sejarah Perbandingan Manajemen Pendidikan. Dinamika Pembelajaran : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Bahasa, 2(4), 01–13. https://doi.org/10.62383/dilan.v2i4.2398